Search warrants.
Summary
Existing law allows a search warrant to be issued upon probable cause, supported by affidavit, naming or describing the person to be searched or searched for, and particularly describing the property, thing, or things and the place to be searched. Existing law also specifies the grounds upon which a search warrant may be issued, including, among other grounds, when the property or things to be seized constitute evidence showing that a felony has been committed. Existing law defines the crime of disorderly conduct as including, among other things, actions involving the use of an instrumentality to view the interior of specified rooms with the intent to invade the privacy of individuals, or the use of specified devices to secretly videotape film, photograph, or to record an identifiable person either under or through their clothing, for purposes of viewing the body or undergarments, or in a state of full or partial undress, as specified. Under existing law, these crimes are punishable as misdemeanors. This bill would authorize a search warrant to be issued on the grounds that the property or things to be seized consist of evidence that tends to show that a violation of the above described crime of disorderly conduct has occurred or is occurring. The bill would also make a technical, nonsubstantive change.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
Apr 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Sep 2017
Introduced Feb 13, 2017
Signed Sep 28, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 13, 2017 · Assembly Sep 14, 2017
How they voted
36–2
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Sep 13, 2017
D
Democratic27
85% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
11
Committee
6
Amendments
5
Sep 28, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 14, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-0-3)
assembly
Sep 14, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 3367.).
lower
Sep 13, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-2-2)
senate
Sep 13, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 15 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 10, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 3, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 20, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 19, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 13).
upper
May 10, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and APPR.
upper
Apr 3, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 28).
lower
Mar 21, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 27, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 14, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Dante Acosta
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 539
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 539. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline