AB 529 California Assembly · 2017-2018 Regular Session

Juveniles: sealing of records.

Summary
Existing law generally subjects any person under 18 years of age who commits a crime to the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge that person to be a ward of the court. Under existing law, juvenile court proceedings to declare a minor a ward of the court are commenced by the filing of a petition by the probation officer, the district attorney after consultation with the probation officer, or the prosecuting attorney, as specified. Existing law authorizes a judge of the juvenile court to dismiss a petition, or set aside the findings and dismiss a petition, if the court finds that the interests of justice and the welfare of the minor require that dismissal, or if the court finds that the minor is not in need of treatment or rehabilitation. This bill would require, if a person who has been alleged to be a ward of the juvenile court and has his or her petition dismissed or if the petition is not sustained by the court after an adjudication hearing, the court to seal all records pertaining to that dismissed petition that are in the custody of the juvenile court, and in the custody of law enforcement agencies, the probation department, or the Department of Justice in accordance with a specified procedure. The bill would, when a record has been sealed by the court based on a dismissed petition, authorize the prosecutor, within 6 months of the date of dismissal, to petition the court to access, inspect, or utilize the sealed record for the limited purpose of refiling the dismissed petition based on new circumstances, and would require court to determine whether the new circumstances alleged by the prosecutor provide sufficient justification for accessing, inspecting, or utilizing the sealed record in order to refile the dismissed petition. The bill would make additional technical changes. By imposing new duties on local agencies relating to sealing juvenile records, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require a probation department to seal the records of a juvenile upon satisfactory completion of a program of diversion or supervision to which a juvenile is referred by the probation department or prosecutor in lieu of filing a petition to adjudge the juvenile a ward. The bill would also require a public or private agency operating a diversion program to seal the records in its custody. The bill would require the probation department to notify the juvenile, in writing, that his or her records have been sealed or notify the juvenile, in writing, of the reasons that the records were not sealed. If the records are not sealed, the bill would allow the juvenile to petition the court to review the decision. The bill would authorize a probation department to access sealed records under these provisions for a limited purpose, as specified. By imposing new duties on local probation departments relating to sealing juvenile records, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 786 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by SB 312 to be operative only if this bill and SB 312 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Feb 13, 2017 Signed Oct 11, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 13, 2017 · Assembly May 1, 2017

How they voted

303
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Sep 13, 2017
D Democratic25
25 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican10
5 Yea 3 Nay 2
50% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
30
Key actions
15
Committee
9
Amendments
7
Oct 11, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 14, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 49. Noes 26. Page 3367.).
lower
Sep 13, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-3-2)
senate
Sep 13, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 15 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 7, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Sep 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (September 1).
upper
Jul 17, 2017
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 22, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 13, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 7, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 6, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 6).
upper
May 26, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 10, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 1, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-21-9)
assembly
Apr 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (April 26).
lower
Mar 28, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (March 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 21, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 27, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 14, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Mark Stone
Mark Stone
DDemocratic
CA
29