Advertising and solicitations: government documents.
Summary
Existing law makes it unlawful for a person, firm, corporation, or association that is a nongovernmental entity to use a seal, emblem, insignia, trade or brand name, or any term, symbol, or content that reasonably could be interpreted or construed as implying any federal, state, or local government, military veteran entity, or military or veteran service organization connection, approval, or endorsement of a product or service, unless certain criteria are met. This provision includes financial products, goods, or services, including mailings, electronic messages, Internet Web sites, periodicals, or television commercials disseminated unless the nongovernmental entity has an expressed connection with or approval of that governmental entity. Existing law, despite that general prohibition, permits a nongovernmental entity, as specified, to advertise or promote an event, presentation, seminar, workshop, or other public gathering using a seal, emblem, insignia, trade or brand name, or any other term, symbol, or content, if that nongovernmental entity has an expressed connection with, or the approval or endorsement of, a federal, state, or local government, military veteran entity, or military or veteran service organization. Existing law authorizes a nongovernmental entity to solicit information, solicit the purchase of or payment for a product or service, or solicit the contribution of funds or membership fees, by any means, including, but not limited to, a mailing, electronic message, Internet Web site, periodical, or television commercial disseminated in this state, using a seal, emblem, insignia, trade or brand name, or any other term, symbol, or content, if the person, firm, corporation, or association that is a nongovernmental entity meets certain requirements, including prominently disclosing that the product or service has not been approved or endorsed by any governmental agency. This bill would permit a person, firm, corporation, or association that is a nongovernmental entity to solicit a fee for providing a copy of a public record if that solicitation meets specified requirements. Those requirements would include a certain disclosure requirement stating that the document is an advertisement, the fee or cost charged by the relevant state or local government agency to obtain a copy of the record that the solicitation is offering to obtain, and information necessary to contact the state or local agency with custody of the record. The bill would define "solicit" for purposes of these provisions. The bill would authorize the Attorney General, a district attorney, or a city attorney to bring an action against a person who violates this provision and would authorize the court to order the person in violation to refund all of the moneys paid to the victim. The bill would require the court to impose a civil penalty in an amount of not more than $100 for each unlawful solicitation document distributed, and not more than $200 for each subsequent document distributed in violation of this provision. The bill would include related legislature findings.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Aug 2017
Signed into Law
Sep 2017
Introduced Feb 13, 2017
Signed Sep 26, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2017 · Assembly Sep 5, 2017
How they voted
30–1
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 32
Aug 31, 2017
D
Democratic22
95% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
12
Committee
9
Amendments
4
Sep 26, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 5, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-3-3)
assembly
Sep 5, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 73. Noes 3. Page 2919.).
lower
Aug 31, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-1-1)
senate
Aug 31, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 24, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jul 17, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 19, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 6, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 18, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 26).
lower
Mar 30, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 28, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (March 21).
lower
Feb 27, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 14, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 492
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 492. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline