Local government reorganization.
Summary
The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, among other things, establishes procedures for consideration of a proposal for change of organization or reorganization, as defined. Existing law requires that an applicant seeking a change of organization or reorganization submit a plan for providing services within the affected territory that includes, among other requirements, an enumeration and description of the services to be extended to the affected territory and an indication of when those services can feasibly be extended. This bill would specify that the plan is required to also include specific information regarding services currently provided to the affected territory, as applicable, and make related changes. The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 authorizes any district to which annexation of territory is proposed to adopt and transmit to the local agency formation commission a resolution requesting termination of proceedings, as specified, and requires the resolution to be based upon written findings supported by substantial evidence in the record that the request is justified by a financial or service-related concern. This bill would require the resolution to be based upon written findings supported by substantial evidence in the record that the request is justified as described above or because the territory is already receiving electrical service under a service area agreement approved by the Public Utilities Commission, as specified. The bill would require findings related to existing provision of electrical service by an irrigation district pursuant to a service area agreement approved under a specified provision to be based on the records of the district and the Public Utilities Commission, as provided.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Jun 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Jun 2017
Signed into Law
Jul 2017
Introduced Feb 13, 2017
Signed Jul 10, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Jun 22, 2017
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Jun 22, 2017
D
Democratic25
96% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Jul 10, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 22, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
Jun 22, 2017
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 14, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 14).
upper
May 24, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 4, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 3).
lower
Mar 15, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 14, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 27, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 14, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 6 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 464
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 464. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline