Employers: wage discrimination.
Summary
Existing law prohibits an employer from paying any of its employees at wage rates less than the rates paid to employees of the opposite sex for substantially similar work, when viewed as a composite of skill, effort, and responsibility, and performed under similar working conditions, unless the employer demonstrates that one or more specific factors, reasonably applied, account for the entire wage differential. Existing law also similarly prohibits an employer from paying any of its employees at wage rates less than the rates paid to employees of another race or ethnicity for substantially similar work. Existing law authorizes an employee paid lesser wages in violation of these prohibitions to file a complaint with the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, and authorizes the employee, the division, or the Department of Industrial Relations to commence a civil action for the wages the employee was deprived of because of the violation, interest on those wages, and liquidated damages. Under existing law, an employer or other person who violates or causes a violation of that prohibition, or who reduces the wages of any employee in order to comply with that prohibition, is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would define "employer" for those purposes to include public and private employers. The bill would specify that a public employer is not subject to the misdemeanor provision.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2016
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Dec 5, 2016
Signed Oct 14, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 14, 2017
How they voted
40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
Sep 14, 2017
D
Democratic27
100% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Oct 14, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 14, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (40-0)
senate
Sep 14, 2017
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Sep 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (September 1).
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 12, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 27, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 8, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on P.E. & R. and JUD.
upper
May 10, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 10).
lower
Apr 20, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 6, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Dec 6, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 5.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Cooper
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 46
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 46. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline