Taxation: prison contracts: goods and services.
Summary
Existing law imposes various taxes, including taxes on the privilege of engaging in certain activities. The Fee Collection Procedures Law, the violation of which is a crime, provides procedures for the collection of certain fees and surcharges. This bill, for the privilege of contracting with a state prison, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, or the Department of General Services to provide a state prison with goods, services, or both, would impose a tax on vendors, as defined, at the rate equal to 10% of the final contract price, as defined, for contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2018. The bill would require all amounts paid, less refunds, to be deposited into the State Incarceration Prevention Fund, which this bill would establish in the State Treasury, and would continuously appropriate those moneys to the State Department of Education for preschool and after school programs for the purposes of providing services to prevent people from being incarcerated and providing early intervention programs, less the amount needed to reimburse the State Board of Equalization and the Attorney General for costs incurred in administering these provisions. The bill would prohibit this tax from being passed through to the state by way of higher prices for the goods or services in the contract, and would require a vendor to certify under penalty of perjury that this tax was not passed through to the state. The bill would require a vendor to pay a penalty if it fails to comply with these provisions. The bill would require the Attorney General to enforce this prohibition and would authorize the Attorney General to monitor and, if necessary, investigate any instance where a vendor has passed or attempted to pass the tax through to the state. The bill would require the State Board of Equalization to assess and collect the tax imposed by this part pursuant to the Fee Collection Procedures Law and would provide an appeals process for a person from whom the state incarceration prevention tax is determined to be due, as provided. By expanding the application of the Fee Collection Procedures Law, the violation of which is a crime, and by expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill imposes a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2016
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Dec 5, 2016
Last action Feb 1, 2018
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
4
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Jan 18, 2018
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 17, 2017
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 11, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 10, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
May 3, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 1, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 24).
lower
Apr 18, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Apr 17, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Read second time and amended.
lower
Jan 19, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Dec 6, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 5.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tony Thurmond
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 43
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 43. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline