Local government: the Ralph M. Brown Act.
Summary
The Ralph M. Brown Act requires that all meetings of a legislative body of a local agency be open and public, except that closed sessions may be held under prescribed circumstances. Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a local agency to use teleconferencing for the benefit of the public and the legislative body of a local agency in connection with any meeting or proceeding authorized by law provided that the teleconferenced meeting or proceeding complies with all otherwise applicable requirements and provisions of law relating to a specific type of meeting or proceeding. Existing law, until January 1, 2018, authorizes a health authority that conducts a teleconference meeting to count members who are outside the jurisdiction of the authority toward the establishment of a quorum when participating in the teleconference if at least 50% of the number of members that would establish a quorum are present within the boundaries of the territory over which the authority exercises jurisdiction, and the health authority provides a teleconference number, and associated access codes, if any, that allows any person to call in to participate in the meeting, as specified. This bill would extend the operation of these provisions relating to the establishment of a quorum for teleconferenced meetings of a health authority indefinitely. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Jul 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Jul 2017
Signed into Law
Jul 2017
Introduced Feb 9, 2017
Signed Jul 31, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Jul 18, 2017
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Jul 18, 2017
D
Democratic27
92% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Jul 31, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 18, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-2)
senate
Jul 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28).
upper
Jun 8, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 11, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 10).
lower
Apr 5, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 21, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 10, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Sebastian Ridley-Thomas
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 428
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 428. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline