Confidential communications: domestic violence.
Summary
Existing law makes it a crime, subject to specified exemptions, for a person to intentionally eavesdrop upon or record a confidential communication by means of an electronic amplifying or recording device without the consent of all parties to the confidential communication. Existing law exempts from the prohibition the recording of a confidential communication made for the purpose of obtaining evidence reasonably believed to relate to the commission by another party to the communication of certain crimes, including any felony involving violence against the person making the recording. Existing law also allows a judge to include a provision in a domestic violence restraining order permitting a victim of domestic violence to record any prohibited communication made to him or her by the perpetrator. This bill would allow a party to a confidential communication to record the communication for the purpose of obtaining evidence reasonably believed to relate to domestic violence, as specified, and the evidence so obtained would not be rendered inadmissible in a prosecution against the perpetrator for domestic violence. The bill would also authorize a victim of domestic violence who is seeking a domestic violence restraining order from a court to record specified communications made by the perpetrator for the exclusive purpose and use of providing the evidence to the court.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Aug 2017
Assembly Passage
Mar 2017
Senate Passage
Jul 2017
Signed into Law
Sep 2017
Introduced Feb 9, 2017
Signed Sep 1, 2017
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
6
Committee
5
Amendments
3
Sep 1, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 21, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2678.).
lower
Jul 17, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 19 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 11, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jun 6, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 10, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and APPR.
upper
Mar 21, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 14).
lower
Feb 21, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 10, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
lower
1 primary · 9 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 413
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 413. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline