AB 359 California Assembly · 2017-2018 Regular Session

In-custody informants.

Summary
Existing law defines an in-custody informant to mean a person, other than a codefendant, percipient witness, accomplice, or coconspirator whose testimony is based upon statements made by the defendant while both the defendant and the informant are held within a correctional institution. Existing law prohibits a law enforcement or correctional official from giving, offering, or promising to give any monetary payment in excess of $50 in return for an in-custody informant's testimony in any criminal proceeding, as specified. Existing law requires the prosecution to file with the court a written statement prior to trial setting out any and all consideration, as defined, promised to, or received by, the in-custody informant when the prosecution calls an in-custody informant as a witness in any criminal trial. This bill would revise the definition of an in-custody informant to refer to a person, other than a codefendant, percipient witness, accomplice, or coconspirator who provides testimony or information for use in the investigation or prosecution of a defendant based upon statements made by the defendant while both the defendant and the informant are housed within a correctional institution. The bill would require the prosecutor, when the prosecution intends to use information or testimony from an in-custody informant in any criminal prosecution, to file with the court a written statement setting out the substance of all communications between the informant and any member of the prosecution, or a law enforcement or correctional agency, regarding the informant's possible testimony or participation in information gathering, and setting out any and all consideration impliedly or expressly offered or promised to, or requested or received by, the in-custody informant. The bill would require the statement to contain specified information, including the informant's complete criminal history, including pending criminal charges or investigations in which the informant is a suspect. The bill would authorize disclosure of the statement to the defense to be denied, restricted, or deferred upon a showing of good cause, as defined. The bill would also revise the definition of consideration for purposes of these provisions. This bill would expand the scope of the prohibition against a law enforcement or correctional official giving, offering, or promising to give a monetary payment to make it applicable to a member of a prosecutorial entity, among other changes. The bill would also make the provision applicable to property and gifts, among other benefits, and would limit the combined value of those benefits to $100. The bill would also make technical changes.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Jun 2017
Assembly Passage
Jun 2017
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 8, 2017 Last action Aug 24, 2018
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2017

How they voted

5111
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 70
Jun 1, 2017
D Democratic48
41 Yea 5 Nay 2
85% Yea
I Independent1
1
0% Nay
R Republican21
10 Yea 6 Nay 5
47% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
21
Key actions
5
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Aug 24, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jun 27, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 27).
upper
Jun 14, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 1, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (51-11-8)
assembly
Mar 21, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 21).
lower
Mar 20, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 16, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 21, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 9, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 11.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Reggie Jones-Sawyer
Reggie Jones-Sawyer
DDemocratic
CA
57