AB 344 California Assembly · 2017-2018 Regular Session

Toll evasion violations.

Summary
Existing law prohibits a person from evading or attempting to evade the payment of tolls or other charges on any vehicular crossing or toll highway, and makes a violation of these provisions subject to civil penalties, as specified. If a vehicle is found to have evaded tolls on any toll road or toll bridge, existing law requires an issuing agency or a processing agency, within 21 days of the violation, to forward to the registered owner a notice of toll evasion violation setting forth the violation, as specified. Existing law authorizes, within 21 days from the issuance of the notice of a toll evasion violation, or within 15 days from the mailing of the notice of delinquent toll evasion, whichever occurs later, a person to contest a notice of toll evasion violation or a notice of delinquent toll evasion. Existing law requires the processing agency to either investigate with its own records and staff or request that the issuing agency to investigate the circumstances of the notice, and requires the processing agency to mail the results of the investigation to the person who contested the violation. If the person is not satisfied with the results of the investigation, existing law authorizes the person to deposit the amount of the toll evasion penalty and request an administrative review, as prescribed. Existing law requires the review to be conducted in accordance with specified written procedure established by the processing agency and authorizes the agency's final decision to be delivered personally or by first-class mail. Within 20 days after mailing of the final decision, the contestant may seek review by filing an appeal to the superior court. This bill would not require a person contesting a notice of toll evasion violation or notice of delinquent toll evasion to pay the toll evasion penalty until after the processing agency or issuing agency finds as a result of an investigation, or the processing agency finds as a result of an administrative review, or a court finds as a result of a hearing, that the contestant did commit a toll evasion violation, whichever occurs later. The bill would authorize an administrative review to include reviews of multiple notices of toll evasion violation or notices of delinquent toll evasion of a person.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Jul 2017
Assembly Passage
Apr 2017
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 7, 2017 Last action Jul 10, 2017
Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
11
Key actions
0
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Jul 10, 2017
Senate · Reported by committee
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
Jul 3, 2017
Senate · Amendment adopted
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
Jun 27, 2017
Senate · Reported by committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
May 10, 2017
Senate · Referred to committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
Mar 28, 2017
Assembly · Reported by committee
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (March 27).
Feb 21, 2017
Assembly · Referred to committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
Feb 8, 2017
Assembly · Reported by committee
From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Melissa A. Melendez
Melissa A. Melendez
RRepublican
CA
28