Vehicles: automated speed enforcement: five-year pilot program.
Summary
Existing law establishes a basic speed law that prohibits a person from driving a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent given the weather, visibility, traffic, highway conditions, and in no event at a speed that endangers the safety of persons or property. Existing law does not expressly authorize the use of automated speed enforcement in this state. This bill would authorize, no later than January 1, 2019, the City of San Jose (San Jose) and the City and County of San Francisco (San Francisco) to implement a 5-year pilot program utilizing an automated speed enforcement system (ASE system) for speed limit enforcement on certain streets, if the system meets specified requirements, including that the presence of a fixed or mobile ASE system is clearly identified by signs, as specified, and trained peace officers or other trained designated municipal employees are utilized to oversee the operation of the fixed and mobile ASE systems. The bill would require San Jose and San Francisco to adopt an ASE System Use Policy, as specified, and develop uniform guidelines for, among other things, the processing and storage of confidential information. The bill would provide that a speed violation that is recorded by an ASE system is subject to a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $100. The bill would, among other things, provide for the issuance of a notice of violation, an initial review, an administrative hearing, and an appeals process, as specified, for a violation enforced by an ASE system. The bill would also authorize the processing agency to assess delinquent fees, as specified, if payment of the civil penalty is not received within a specified time. The bill would require the Department of Motor Vehicles to refuse to renew the registration of a vehicle if, among other things, the owner has not paid the civil penalty and delinquent fees, except as specified. The bill would require the department to remit all penalties and delinquent fees collected, after deducting its own administrative fees, to the processing agency. Existing law provides that payments for specified penalties, including penalties for offenses relating to the parking of a vehicle, required to register or transfer the registration of a vehicle, constitute a lien on the vehicle on which the payments are due or that was involved in the offenses, and on any other vehicle owned by the owner of that vehicle. This bill would, until January 1, 2024, also include payments for penalties for offenses related to the ASE system operated by San Jose or San Francisco for which a notice of violation has been served on the owner or recipient of a reissued citation and any delinquent fees added to the penalty as constituting a lien on the specified vehicles. Existing law transfers the responsibility and authority for the collection of specified delinquent amounts, including penalties for offenses relating to the standing or parking of a vehicle, from the department to the Franchise Tax Board. This bill would, until January 1, 2024, also transfer to the board the responsibility and authority to collect penalties for offenses related to the ASE system operated by San Jose or San Francisco for which a notice of violation has been served on the owner or recipient of a reissued notice of violation and any delinquent fees added to the penalty. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of San Jose and the City and County of San Francisco. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 7, 2017
Last action Feb 1, 2018
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
5
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Jan 8, 2018
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 24, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing for testimony only.
lower
Apr 19, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Apr 17, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Apr 6, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 27, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 23, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on P. & C.P. and TRANS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Mar 22, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Mar 21, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 21, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 8, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
David Chiu
DDemocratic
Co
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Co
Kansen Chu
DDemocratic
Co
Scott Wiener
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 342
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 342. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline