Indian children.
Summary
(1) Existing federal law, the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA) , governs the proceedings for determining the placement of an Indian child when that child is removed from the custody of his or her parent or guardian. Existing law specifies that the state is committed to protecting the essential tribal relations and best interest of an Indian child by promoting practices in accordance with ICWA. Existing law requires a court in all Indian child custody proceedings to, among other things, comply with ICWA. Under existing law, a determination by an Indian tribe that an unmarried person who is under 18 years of age, is either a member of an Indian tribe, or is eligible for membership in an Indian tribe and a biological child of a member of an Indian tribe, constitutes a significant political affiliation with the tribe and requires application of ICWA to the proceedings. Under existing law, a court, a county welfare department, and the probation department have an affirmative and continuing duty to inquire as to whether a child is or may be an Indian child in all dependency proceedings and in any juvenile wardship proceeding if the child is at risk of entering foster care or is in foster care. Under existing law, if a court, social worker, or probation officer knows or has reason to know that an Indian child is involved in a custody proceeding, a notice meeting specified requirements is required to be sent to the minor's parents or legal guardian, Indian custodian, and the minor's tribe. Existing law also requires the notice to be sent to all tribes of which the child may be a member or eligible for membership, as provided. In accordance with federal law, this bill would revise and recast those provisions. Among other things, the bill would revise the specific steps a social worker, probation officer, or court is required to take in making an inquiry of a child's possible status as an Indian child. The bill would also revise the various notice requirements that are mandated during an Indian child custody proceeding, including a proceeding for an emergency removal of an Indian child from the custody of his or her parents or Indian custodian. The bill would require the State Department of Social Services to adopt any regulations necessary to implement these provisions, and would require the Judicial Council to adopt any forms or rules of court necessary to implement these provisions. The bill would make other conforming changes. (2) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 212.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1930 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1930 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (3) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 361.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1930 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1930 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (4) By increasing the duties on county welfare departments, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
May 2018
Senate Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Feb 16, 2018
Signed Sep 27, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Aug 28, 2018 · Assembly May 31, 2018
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Aug 28, 2018
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
12
Committee
11
Amendments
7
Sep 27, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2018
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6898.).
lower
Aug 28, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
Aug 28, 2018
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 22, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 17, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 6, 2018
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 27, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 18, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 13, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 31, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-1)
assembly
May 25, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 25).
lower
May 23, 2018
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 17, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 12, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 11, 2018
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 11, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 3, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Apr 2, 2018
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 15, 2018
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUM. S. and JUD.
lower
Feb 17, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marie Waldron
RRepublican
Co
BM
Brian Maienschein
DDemocratic
Co
Devon Mathis
RRepublican
Co
Eloise Reyes
DDemocratic
Co
Tom Daly
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 3176
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 3176. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline