Dating service contracts: online services.
Summary
Existing law defines and regulates dating service contracts. Existing law requires a dating service contract to be in writing and requires that a copy of the contract be provided to the buyer at the time he or she signs the contract. Existing law further requires that a dating service contract contain a conspicuous statement, placed as specified, regarding the right of the buyer to cancel the agreement. Existing law establishes procedures for cancellation, including providing that cancellation occurs when the buyer gives written notice of cancellation by mail, telegram, or delivery to the seller at the address specified in the agreement or offer. This bill would establish specific alternate provisions for a dating service contract with an online dating service, as defined. The alternate provisions would include requirements regarding entering into a contract online, providing an electronic copy of the contract to the buyer, and including a version of the conspicuous statement in the online contract. The bill would also provide for different terms of contract for online dating service contracts and for the cancellation of such a contract by email. The bill would additionally impose prescribed requirements on an online dating service to maintain both a reference or link to information on dating safety awareness and a means to report the behavior of other online dating service users.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
Jun 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Feb 6, 2017
Signed Oct 8, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 12, 2017 · Assembly Jun 1, 2017
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
Sep 12, 2017
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
11
Committee
9
Amendments
6
Oct 8, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 13, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 1. Page 3309.).
lower
Sep 12, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-5)
senate
Sep 11, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 13 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 6, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 18).
upper
Jun 14, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 1, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-4-2)
assembly
May 22, 2017
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1649.)
lower
May 3, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 2).
lower
May 1, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Apr 27, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 27, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 23, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Mar 22, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 21, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 7, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 9.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Kevin Mullin
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 314
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 314. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline