California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: qualified opportunity zones.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA exempts certain projects from its requirements. Existing federal law authorizes the governor of a state to nominate a specified number of census tracts that meet certain requirements as a qualified opportunity zone and authorizes the Treasury Secretary to designate those tracts as qualified opportunity zones. Existing federal law provides certain federal tax incentives to a taxpayer who invests in a qualified opportunity fund, which is an investment vehicle organized for the purpose of investing in qualified opportunity zone property, as prescribed. This bill would exempt a project that is financed by a qualified opportunity fund and that meets certain requirements from CEQA. The bill would require the project proponent to make certain certifications regarding the project. The bill would require a lead agency, before making a determination that the project is exempt from CEQA, to hold a noticed public hearing on the project, as specified. The bill would require the lead agency, if it determines that a project is exempt from CEQA under the above exemption and determines to approve or carry out the project, to file a specified notice with the Office of Planning and Research. Because a lead agency would have to determine the applicability of the exemption, to take certain specified action before determining that a project is exempt, and to file a notice with the Office of Planning and Research, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
May 2018
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 16, 2018
Last action Aug 16, 2018
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2018
How they voted
57–11
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 75
May 31, 2018
D
Democratic52
86% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican22
50% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
10
Committee
12
Amendments
4
Aug 16, 2018
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 13, 2018
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 6, 2018
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Aug 6, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 21, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 14, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jun 13, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
May 31, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (57-11-7)
assembly
May 9, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (May 9).
lower
Apr 26, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Apr 24, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Apr 18, 2018
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 16, 2018
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 2, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 22, 2018
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 22, 2018
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and L. & E.
lower
Feb 17, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 3030
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 3030. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline