Farm animals: egg-laying hens: confinement.
Summary
(1) Existing law, enacted by Proposition 2, an initiative measure approved by the voters at the November 4, 2008, statewide general election, prohibits a person from tethering or confining a calf raised for veal, a pregnant pig, or an egg-laying hen on a farm in a manner that prevents the animal from lying down, standing up, fully extending its limbs, or turning around freely, except under specified circumstances. Existing statutory law prohibits a shelled egg from being sold or contracted for sale for human consumption in California if the seller knows or should have known that the egg is the product of an egg-laying hen that was confined on a farm or place that is not in compliance with the above-specified animal care standards. This bill would also prohibit a farm owner or operator in California from confining an egg-laying hen in an enclosure that is not in compliance with specified standards, except as provided. The bill would prohibit a person from selling or contracting to sell shell eggs or liquid eggs in California from an egg-laying hen that was in an enclosure not in compliance with the specified standards. The bill would make a violation of the bill's provisions a misdemeanor, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Department of Food and Agriculture to promulgate regulations for the implementation of those provisions on or before September 1, 2019. (2) Existing law requires California and out-of-state egg handlers and producers to pay to the Secretary of Food and Agriculture a maximum fee of $0.15 for each 30 dozen eggs sold in this state, as provided. Existing law requires the fees paid to the secretary under these provisions to be deposited in the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, a continuously appropriated fund for these purposes. Existing law requires the secretary to establish a lower rate for these fees if the funds derived from the assessment are more than reasonably necessary to cover the cost of administration and enforcement of the preparation for market and marketing of eggs, as specified. This bill would additionally authorize these fees to be used for the administration and enforcement of the provisions described in paragraph (1) and would make a conforming change. By expanding the purposes of a continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
May 2018
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 16, 2018
Last action Aug 16, 2018
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2018
How they voted
69–2
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 75
May 31, 2018
D
Democratic52
96% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican22
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Aug 16, 2018
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Jul 2, 2018
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 20, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 19, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 13, 2018
Committee
Referred to Coms. on AGRI. and PUB. S.
upper
May 31, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-2-4)
assembly
May 25, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 1.) (May 25).
lower
Apr 25, 2018
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 12, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 12, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
lower
Feb 17, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marc Levine
DDemocratic
Co
Devon Mathis
RRepublican
Co
Jose Medina
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 3021
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 3021. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline