Pharmacy benefit managers.
Summary
Existing law requires a pharmacy benefit manager that reimburses a contracting pharmacy for a drug on a maximum allowable cost basis to provide the contracting pharmacy with specified information regarding the data used to determine the maximum allowable cost of a drug. This bill would require, except as provided, a pharmacy benefit manager to disclose certain information to a purchaser, including, among other things, the aggregate amount of rebates, retrospective utilization discounts, and other income that the pharmacy benefit manager would receive from a pharmaceutical manufacturer or labeler in connection with drug benefits related to the purchaser. The bill would excuse a pharmacy benefit manager from making these disclosures unless the purchaser agrees to keep any proprietary information disclosed to it pursuant to these provisions confidential, as specified. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. This bill would require pharmacy benefit managers to be licensed by the department and would require a pharmacy benefit manager to report to the department, on a quarterly basis, regarding its compliance with the standards provided by the act. The bill would require the department to develop the application forms and standards for determining eligibility for a pharmacy benefit manager license and would require the department to set the licensing fee, as provided. The bill would also provide the department with the authority to enforce the provisions of the act and would make a willful violation of the bill's provisions by a pharmacy benefit manager a crime. Because a willful violation of the bill's provisions by a pharmacy benefit manager would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2016
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Dec 5, 2016
Last action Feb 1, 2018
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
0
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Feb 1, 2018
Assembly · Failed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Jan 31, 2018
Assembly · Failed
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
May 26, 2017
Assembly · Reported by committee
In committee: Held under submission.
May 24, 2017
Assembly · Referred to committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
May 15, 2017
Assembly · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
May 10, 2017
Assembly · Amendment adopted
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 2.) (May 9).
May 8, 2017
Assembly · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
May 3, 2017
Assembly · Amendment adopted
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 2).
Apr 18, 2017
Assembly · Reported by committee
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
Apr 6, 2017
Assembly · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Coms. on B. & P. and HEALTH pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
Mar 29, 2017
Assembly · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
Mar 28, 2017
Assembly · Amendment offered
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
Mar 27, 2017
Assembly · Referred to committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and B. & P.
Dec 6, 2016
Assembly · Reported by committee
From printer. May be heard in committee January 5.
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Adrin Nazarian
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 29
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 29. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline