High-occupancy toll lanes: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority.
Summary
Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of the state highway system. Existing law authorizes a regional transportation agency or the department to apply to the California Transportation Commission to develop and operate high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes or other toll facilities. Existing law provides for the review and approval by the commission of each proposed toll facility pursuant to eligibility criteria set forth in guidelines established by the commission and requires a toll facility approved by the commission to be subject to specified minimum requirements. Existing law requires revenue remaining after certain expenses are subtracted to be used in the corridor from which the revenue was generated pursuant to an expenditure plan developed by the sponsoring agency. With regard to a facility sponsored by a regional transportation agency, existing law requires the regional transportation agency to develop an expenditure plan in consultation with the department and the governing board of the regional transportation agency to review and approve the expenditure plan and any updates. This bill would authorize the Santa Clara Transportation Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) to apply to the commission pursuant to the above-described provisions to conduct, administer, and operate HOT lanes or other toll facilities on State Highway Route 101 and a specified portion of State Highway Route 280 in the City and County of San Francisco if the San Francisco County Transportation Authority (SFCTA) approves the facilities before VTA submits an application to the commission for approval. The bill would require VTA to conduct, administer, and operate the facility in coordination with SFCTA. The bill would require SFCTA, in collaboration with the department and VTA, to develop the expenditure plan and would require the governing board of SFCTA to review and approve the expenditure plan and any updates. Existing law authorizes VTA to conduct, administer, and operate a value pricing high-occupancy toll (HOT) lane program on 2 corridors included in the high-occupancy vehicle lane system in the County of Santa Clara and on State Highway Route 101 in the County of San Mateo in coordination with the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County and the San Mateo County Transportation Authority, as prescribed. For the value pricing program authorized on State Highway Route 101 in the County of San Mateo, existing law requires all remaining revenue generated by the program after specified expenditures are made to be used in the corridor from which the revenues were generated exclusively for certain purposes. This bill would provide that those remaining revenues may also be used for projects that benefit the corridor, as specified. The bill would make other nonsubstantive and minor substantive changes.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
May 2018
Senate Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Feb 16, 2018
Signed Sep 18, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Aug 29, 2018 · Assembly May 30, 2018
How they voted
24–10
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Aug 29, 2018
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
13
Committee
14
Amendments
5
Sep 18, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2018
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 49. Noes 29. Page 7034.).
lower
Aug 29, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-10-1)
senate
Aug 29, 2018
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 24, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 17, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 13, 2018
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 6, 2018
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 27, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 5.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 20, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Jun 13, 2018
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 7, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 30, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (46-25-1)
assembly
May 25, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 25).
lower
May 2, 2018
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 24, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 17, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Apr 16, 2018
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 20, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Mar 19, 2018
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 19, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 17, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
David Chiu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2865
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2865. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline