Developmental disabilities: regional centers.
Summary
Under existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, the State Department of Developmental Services is responsible for providing various services and supports to persons with developmental disabilities, and for ensuring the appropriateness and quality of those services and supports. Existing law authorizes the department to contract with regional centers to provide these services and supports. Existing law sets forth the department's and the regional center's authority to establish provider rates. Existing law prohibits certain provider rate increases, but authorizes increases to those rates as necessary to adjust employee wages to meet the state minimum wage law. Existing law further requires the department to adopt regulations that specify rates, calculated on the basis of a cost model, including, among other things, changes in the state or federal minimum wage, for community care facilities serving persons with developmental disabilities, as specified. Existing law authorizes the department to approve rate adjustments for a work activity program that demonstrates to the department that the adjustment is necessary, as specified. Existing law authorizes community-based day program and in-home respite services agency providers with temporary payment rates set by the department to seek unanticipated rate adjustments from the department, as specified. This bill would require the cost model described above to also include changes in local minimum wage. The bill would additionally authorize adjustment of prescribed provider rates if the adjustment is necessary in order to pay employees no less than the minimum wage required to comply with an ordinance that increases the minimum wage, as specified. The bill would provide that these provisions become operative on July 1, 2018.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 2, 2017
Last action Sep 1, 2017
Floor votes · Assembly May 30, 2017
How they voted
67–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 70
May 30, 2017
D
Democratic48
95% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican21
95% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
6
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Sep 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 8, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
May 30, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-3)
assembly
May 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 26).
lower
Apr 26, 2017
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 8, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 2, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Mar 1, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 13, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 3, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 5.
lower
1 primary · 8 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 279
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 279. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline