Warrants.
Summary
(1) Existing law governs the procedure for issuing a warrant of arrest and requires that a declaration in support of a warrant of probable cause for arrest be a sworn statement made in writing. Existing law authorizes a magistrate to take an oral statement under oath in lieu of the written declaration if the oath is taken under penalty of perjury and recorded and transcribed, or, in the alternative, made during a telephone conversation with the magistrate. If the oath was made during a telephone conversation, existing law requires the magistrate to carry out specified duties in connection with issuing the warrant of arrest, as specified. Existing law deems the warrant signed by the magistrate to be the original warrant and the copy of the document transmitted to the declarant to be a duplicate. This bill would delete the authority of a magistrate to take an oral statement under oath made during a telephone conversation in lieu of a declaration in support of a warrant of probable cause for arrest and would eliminate specified related procedural duties of the magistrate. The bill would deem the warrant that is signed by the magistrate and received by the declarant to be the original warrant. The bill would make technical and conforming changes. (2) Existing law requires a search warrant to be issued upon probable cause, supported by a written affidavit, and governs the process for issuing a search warrant. Existing law authorizes a magistrate to take an oral statement under oath in lieu of a written affidavit if the oral statement is made under penalty of perjury or, in the alternative, made during a telephone conversation with the magistrate. Existing law requires the magistrate to carry out specified duties in issuing a search warrant. This bill would delete the authority of a magistrate to take an oral statement under oath made during a telephone conversation and would eliminate related procedural duties of the magistrate, as specified. The bill would make related and conforming changes.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
Apr 2018
Senate Passage
Jul 2018
Signed into Law
Aug 2018
Introduced Feb 15, 2018
Signed Aug 20, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Jul 5, 2018 · Assembly Apr 23, 2018
How they voted
28–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 31
Jul 5, 2018
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
8
Committee
5
Amendments
3
Aug 20, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 6, 2018
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6142.).
lower
Jul 5, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-0-3)
senate
Jul 5, 2018
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 26, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 26).
upper
Jun 13, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 3, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 23, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-0-4)
assembly
Apr 12, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 10).
lower
Mar 8, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 16, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jay Obernolte
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2710
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2710. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline