AB 2546 California Assembly · 2017-2018 Regular Session

Commercial email advertisements.

Summary
Existing law prohibits a person or entity from initiating or advertising in unsolicited commercial email advertisements and places other restrictions related to that activity. Existing law defines the term "commercial email advertisement" for purposes of those provisions to mean an electronic mail message initiated for the purpose of advertising or promoting the lease, sale, rental, gift offer, or other disposition of property, goods, services, or extension of credit. Existing law defines the term "unsolicited commercial email advertisement" for purposes of those provisions to exclude a commercial email advertisement sent to a recipient who has a preexisting or current relationship with the advertiser promoting the lease, sale, rental, gift offer, or other disposition of any property, goods, services, or extension of credit. Existing law further defines the term "preexisting or current business relationship" to mean that the recipient has made an inquiry and has provided his or her email address, or has made an application, purchase, or transaction, with or without consideration, regarding products or services offered by the advertiser. This bill would expand the definition of "commercial email advertisement" to include an electronic mail message initiated for the purpose of advertising or promoting the lease, sale, rental, gift offer, promotion, or other disposition of stocks, bonds, sweepstakes, insurance, employment opportunities, or any other solicitation, excluding charitable or political solicitations. The bill would expand the definition of "preexisting or current business relationship" to include situations in which the recipient has made an inquiry and has provided his or her email address or has made an application, purchase, or transaction, with or without consideration, regarding products or services offered by a commonly branded company of the advertiser. Existing law prohibits a person or entity from advertising in a commercial email advertisement sent from California or to a California email address in certain circumstances, including if the email advertisement contains or is accompanied by falsified, misrepresented, or forged header information or by a 3rd-party's domain name without the permission of the 3rd party. Existing law makes a violation of that prohibition a misdemeanor. This bill would also make it unlawful for a person or entity to initiate a commercial email advertisement sent from California or to a California email address in the above-described circumstances. The bill would expand the prohibition on the advertisement containing a 3rd-party's domain name to also apply to the 3rd-party's email address, but the bill would specify that this prohibition does not affect comparative advertising that references names, user names, domain names, or email addresses. This bill would also prohibit the body of the advertisement from containing a falsified or misrepresented postal address of the advertiser or initiator, a falsified or misrepresented business name, as specified, of the advertiser or initiator, or a falsified or misrepresented unsubscribe link, as specified. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law authorizes the Attorney General, the recipient of an unsolicited commercial email advertisement, and an electronic mail service provider to bring an action against a person or entity that violates those provisions to recover, among other things, liquidated damages and reasonable attorneys fees. Existing law requires the court to reduce liquidated damages, as specified, if the court finds that the defendant established and implemented practices and procedures reasonably designed to effectively prevent unsolicited commercial email advertisements that are in violation of existing law. This bill would also authorize a district attorney, city attorney, or the recipient of an unsolicited commercial email advertisement, as specified, to bring an action under these provisions and would authorize a court to enter an order enjoining violations of those provisions. The bill would add to the findings that the court must make in order to reduce liquidated damages to include, among other things, a finding that the defendant provided its personnel with training regarding practices and procedures designed to effectively prevent the emails prohibited under the bill's provisions. The bill would authorize a prevailing recipient, electronic mail service provider, the Attorney General, district attorney, or city attorney to recover reasonable attorney's fees as costs in addition to other allowable costs. Existing law sets forth findings and declarations of the Legislature relating to unsolicited commercial email advertisements. This bill would revise the findings and declarations of the Legislature regarding regulation of commercial email advertisements and would make other related changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status passed both 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
May 2018
Senate Passage
Aug 2018
Governor
Introduced Feb 15, 2018 Last action Aug 29, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2018 · Assembly Jun 1, 2018

How they voted

25–12
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Aug 23, 2018
D Democratic26
25 Yea 1
96% Yea
R Republican14
12 Nay 2
85% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
28
Key actions
11
Committee
8
Amendments
8
Aug 23, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-12-3)
senate
Aug 23, 2018
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 17, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 6, 2018
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 2, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 28, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 26).
upper
Jun 20, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 19, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 18). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 13, 2018
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and JUD.
upper
Jun 1, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-28-4)
assembly
May 29, 2018
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 5435.)
lower
Apr 18, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (April 18).
lower
Apr 10, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 5, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (April 3).
lower
Mar 22, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Mar 21, 2018
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 5, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 16, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Ed Chau
Ed Chau
DDemocratic
CA
49