Securities transactions: qualification requirements, exemptions, and liability.
Summary
The Corporate Securities Law of 1968 requires securities offered or sold in this state in an issuer or nonissuer transaction to be qualified through an application filed with the Commissioner of Business Oversight, unless exempt from the qualification requirements. That law exempts, among other transactions, certain transactions not involving any public offering, as prescribed. That law also makes it unlawful, for a person in connection with the offer, sale, or purchase of a security, to engage in fraudulent or misleading acts or omissions. This bill would establish a new exemption from the qualification provisions for an offer or sale of any security for which the issuer is a California or foreign corporation that is not a "blind pool" company, as defined, not issuing fractional undivided interests in oil or gas rights or other similar mineral rights, is not an investment company subject to the federal Investment Company Act of 1940 and is not subject to certain reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The bill would require, among other criteria, that the offer or sale be conducted in accordance with certain requirements of federal law limiting the total offering of securities to $300,000 in a 12-month period, less the aggregate offering price for all securities sold, as specified. Existing law authorizes all securities, whether eligible or not for qualification by coordination or notification, to be qualified by permit in accordance with certain provisions. Existing law authorizes an applicant to file a small company application for permit under these provisions if it meets specified conditions, including if the total offering of voting common stock and preferred stock by the applicant to be sold in a 12-month period is limited to 1,000,000, less the aggregate offering price for all securities sold, as prescribed. This bill would increase the amount of that limit on the total offering of voting common stock and preferred stock to $5,000,000, under the conditions described above. The bill would also place restrictions on the ability of applicants to arbitrate any claim or dispute, participate in a class action, or have a jury trial, and would place other related legal limits on applicants. Existing law provides that any person who violates a condition of qualification of the offer or sale of a security is liable to any person acquiring the security sold in violation, who may sue to recover the consideration paid for the security with interest thereon at the legal rate or for damages, as specified. This bill would provide for the recovery of reasonable attorney's fees, as specified. The bill would authorize the award of treble and punitive damages against any person who violates those conditions of qualification by permit authorized by this bill if the court determines that the violation was willful. Existing law imposes liability on any person who engages in specified unlawful activity to the person who purchases a security from him or her or sells a security to him or her, and authorizes the purchaser or seller to sue either for rescission or for damages. The bill would require the court to award reasonable attorney's fees, as specified. The bill also would authorize the court to award treble and punitive damages against a person who violates the above provision in an offer or sale of a security, as authorized by this bill, if the court determines the violation was willful.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2018
Last action Apr 16, 2018
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
5
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Apr 16, 2018
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 2, 2018
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 5, 2018
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F. and JUD.
lower
Feb 15, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Al Muratsuchi
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2527
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2527. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline