Peace officers: misconduct: employment.
Summary
Existing law requires each department or agency in this state that employs peace officers to establish a procedure to investigate complaints by members of the public against the personnel of the department or agency. Existing law requires complaints and any reports or findings related to the complaints to be retained for at least 5 years and allows all complaints retained to be maintained in the peace officer's general personnel file or in a separate file designated by the department or agency. This bill would require each department or agency in this state that employs peace officers to make and retain a record of any investigations of misconduct involving a peace officer in his or her general personnel file or separate file designated by the department or agency. The bill would require a peace officer seeking employment with a department or agency to give written permission for the hiring department or agency to view his or her general personnel file or separate file. Because this bill would increase the duties of local law enforcement agencies, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
Apr 2018
Senate Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Feb 13, 2018
Signed Sep 30, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2018 · Assembly Apr 12, 2018
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Aug 24, 2018
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Sep 30, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 24, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
Aug 24, 2018
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 17, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
upper
Jun 25, 2018
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
May 15, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 25, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 12, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-0-9)
assembly
Apr 4, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 4).
lower
Mar 21, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 1, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 14, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Quirk
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2327
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2327. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline