Department of Motor Vehicles: records: confidentiality.
Summary
Existing law prohibits the disclosure of the home addresses of certain public employees and officials, including judges and court commissioners, that appear in records of the Department of Motor Vehicles upon the request of the employee or official, except to a court, a law enforcement agency, an attorney in a civil or criminal action under certain circumstances, and certain other official entities. Existing law prohibits the disclosure of the home addresses of the public employees and officials described above for a period of 3 years following termination of office or employment, except as specified. Existing law prohibits the disclosure of the home address of a retired peace officer permanently upon his or her request for confidentiality. Existing law also prohibits the disclosure of the home address of the surviving spouse or child of a peace officer for 3 years following the death of the peace officer if he or she died in the line of duty. This bill would clarify that the above-described provisions apply to active or retired judges and court commissioners, and would expand those protections to the surviving spouse or child of a judge or court commissioner, if the judge or court commissioner died in the performance of his or her duties. The bill would also prohibit the disclosure of the home address of a retired judge or court commissioner permanently upon his or her request for confidentiality, and would prohibit the disclosure of the home address of the surviving spouse or child of a judge or court commissioner who died in the performance of his or her duties for 3 years following his or her death. The bill would make conforming changes to those provisions. If the disclosure of the confidential home address of a peace officer, a nonsworn employee of the city police department or county sheriff's office, or the spouses or children of these persons in violation of these provisions results in bodily injury to those persons, existing law makes that violation a felony. This bill would make a violation of these provisions with respect to a judge or court commissioner, or the spouses or children of these persons, a felony, thereby expanding the scope of an existing crime, and imposing a state-mandated local program. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
Apr 2018
Senate Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Feb 13, 2018
Signed Sep 29, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Aug 13, 2018 · Assembly Aug 20, 2018
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 13, 2018
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Sep 29, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 20, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-0)
assembly
Aug 20, 2018
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6370.).
lower
Aug 14, 2018
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 16 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 13, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Aug 6, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jun 25, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.
upper
May 15, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 25, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 4, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 4).
lower
Mar 20, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (March 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 8, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Mar 7, 2018
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 1, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 14, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tom Daly
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2322
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2322. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline