Restraining orders: minor witness: visitation.
Summary
Existing law requires a court to consider issuing a protective order restraining the defendant from contact with a percipient witness in all cases in which a criminal defendant has been convicted of a crime involving domestic violence, rape, unlawful sexual intercourse, participation in a criminal street gang, or any crime requiring registration as a sex offender, if it can be established by clear and convincing evidence that the witness has been harassed by the defendant. Existing law makes a violation of a protective order punishable as contempt, a misdemeanor. This bill would additionally require the court to consider issuing an order restraining a criminal defendant who has been convicted of a crime involving domestic violence from any contact with a minor who is a witness, as defined. The bill would allow the order to include an order authorizing a family or juvenile court to make a subsequent order for safe and appropriate visitation with the defendant's minor child who is a witness, as provided, and would require this order to have precedence in enforcement over a civil court order against the defendant, except as provided. Because a violation of the protective order would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2018
Last action May 25, 2018
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
3
Committee
6
Amendments
1
May 25, 2018
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Apr 18, 2018
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 4, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 3, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 2, 2018
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 1, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 14, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
James Gallagher
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2290
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2290. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline