Local agencies: airports: customer facility charges.
Summary
Existing law authorizes airports to require rental car companies to collect a customer facility charge under specified circumstances for purposes that include financing, designing, and constructing airport vehicle rental facilities and common-use transportation systems. Existing law specifies that the authorization for an airport to impose a customer facility charge becomes inoperative when the bonds used for financing are paid. Existing law, if a bond or other form of indebtedness is not used for financing or if a bond or other form of indebtedness used for financing has been paid, authorizes the Oakland International Airport to require a customer facility charge for a period of up to 10 years from the imposition of the charge, as specified. This bill, until January 1, 2023, would delete the authorization pertaining to the Oakland International Airport and would delete the requirement that the general authorization for an airport to impose a customer facility charge become inoperative when the bonds are paid, except as applied to an alternative fee. Existing law requires the customer facility charge, also referred to as a fee, to be $10 per contract, except as otherwise specified. This bill, instead, would require that fee not to exceed $10. The bill also would prohibit an airport from requiring a rental company to collect a customer facility charge from a consumer if that requirement would result in the rental company collecting more than one customer facility charge from that consumer in connection with a single rental. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 50474.3 of the Government Code proposed by AB 1286 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1286 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
Mar 2017
Senate Passage
Aug 2017
Signed into Law
Sep 2017
Introduced Jan 25, 2017
Signed Sep 27, 2017
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
6
Committee
4
Amendments
4
Sep 27, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 5, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2914.).
lower
Aug 31, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 6, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jun 26, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 20).
upper
May 10, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 16, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (March 14).
lower
Feb 6, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jan 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 25.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Rob Bonta
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 218
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 218. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline