Damages: lead-based paint.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a person who suffers a loss or harm to person or property from the unlawful act or omission of another to recover from the person at fault money damages. This bill would allow the injured party, in any action to recover damages for injury to person or property caused by lead-based paint, to establish a prima facie case that a particular lead paint pigment manufacturer is the cause of the injury if the injured party proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the lead paint pigment manufacturer sold, distributed, or promoted in California either the type of lead paint pigment that caused the injury or a product containing the type of lead paint pigment that caused the injury, and would shift the burden of proof to the lead paint pigment manufacturer to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that it did not sell, distribute, or promote the lead paint pigment that caused the injury or a product containing the type of lead paint pigment that caused the injury during the relevant time period or in the geographical market in which the injury occurred. The bill would make each lead paint pigment manufacturer jointly and severally liable if more than one lead paint pigment manufacturer is found liable for an injury to person or property caused by lead-based paint. The bill would expressly make these provisions retroactive. The bill would also state various findings and declarations of the Legislature related to these provisions. The bill would provide that its provisions are severable.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Jul 2018
Assembly Passage
May 2018
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 12, 2018
Last action Jul 3, 2018
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2018
How they voted
72–0
Passed
Total votes 72
May 31, 2018
D
Democratic50
100% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican21
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Jul 3, 2018
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 21, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.
upper
Jun 20, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on EQ., JUD., and APPR.
upper
Jun 19, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 19, 2018
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 18, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 13, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 31, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (72-0)
assembly
May 25, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 25).
lower
Apr 4, 2018
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 21, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 15, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 14, 2018
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 26, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 13, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 15.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Rob Bonta
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2136
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2136. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline