Punitive damages: minors.
Summary
Existing law provides that in specified civil actions brought by, on behalf of, or for the benefit of, senior citizens or disabled persons, as defined, the trier of fact must consider certain factors in determining the fine or penalty to be imposed. If the trier of fact makes an affirmative finding of any of these factors, existing law permits the imposition of a fine or penalty up to 3 times greater than authorized by statute, or, if the statute does not authorize a specific amount, up to 3 times greater than the amount the trier of fact would have imposed in the absence of that affirmative finding. This bill would add similar provisions applicable to civil actions brought by, on behalf of, or for the benefit of, a minor or nonminor dependent, as defined, who is a victim of commercial sexual exploitation, as defined, against the person who committed the act and who is over 18 years of age, permitting imposition of a fine or penalty, payable to the victim, of up to 3 times greater than authorized by statute if specified findings are made by the trier of fact. The bill would also authorize a court, if no civil penalty is authorized by statute, to award a civil penalty not exceeding $50,000, and not less than $10,000, for each act of commercial sexual exploitation committed by the defendant upon making a specified affirmative finding, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
Apr 2018
Senate Passage
Jul 2018
Signed into Law
Aug 2018
Introduced Feb 8, 2018
Signed Aug 20, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Jul 2, 2018 · Assembly Aug 6, 2018
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Jul 2, 2018
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Amendments
4
Aug 20, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 6, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-2)
assembly
Aug 6, 2018
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6136.).
lower
Jul 3, 2018
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 5 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 2, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Jun 21, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 19).
upper
Apr 19, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 20, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (March 20).
lower
Mar 19, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 15, 2018
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 22, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 9, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 11.
lower
1 primary · 9 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BM
Brian Maienschein
DDemocratic
Co
Dante Acosta
RRepublican
Co
Devon Mathis
RRepublican
Co
Freddie Rodriguez
DDemocratic
Co
Heath Flora
RRepublican
Co
James Gallagher
RRepublican
Co
Janet Nguyen
RRepublican
Co
Jordan Cunningham
RRepublican
Co
Mike Morrell
RRepublican
Co
Patricia C. Bates
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2105
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2105. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline