AB 208 California Assembly · 2017-2018 Regular Session

Deferred entry of judgment: pretrial diversion.

Summary
Existing law allows individuals charged with specified crimes to qualify for deferred entry of judgment. A defendant qualifies if he or she has no conviction for any offense involving controlled substances, the charged offense did not involve violence, there is no evidence of a violation relating to narcotics or restricted dangerous drugs other than a violation that qualifies for the program, the defendant's record does not indicate that probation or parole has ever been revoked without being completed, and the defendant's record does not indicate that he or she has been granted diversion, deferred entry of judgment, or was convicted of a felony within 5 years prior to the alleged commission of the charged offense. Under the existing deferred entry of judgment program, an eligible defendant may have entry of judgment deferred, upon pleading guilty to the offenses charged and entering a drug treatment program for 18 months to 3 years. If the defendant does not perform satisfactorily in the program, does not benefit from the program, is convicted of specified crimes, or engages in criminal activity rendering him or her unsuitable for deferred entry of judgment, the defendant's guilty plea is entered and the court enters judgment and proceeds to schedule a sentencing hearing. If the defendant completes the program, the criminal charges are dismissed. Existing law allows the presiding judge of the superior court, with the district attorney and public defender, to establish a pretrial diversion drug program. This bill would make the deferred entry of judgment program a pretrial diversion program. The bill would make a defendant qualified for the pretrial diversion program if there is no evidence of a contemporaneous violation relating to narcotics or restricted dangerous drugs other than a violation of the offense that qualifies him or her for diversion, the charged offense did not involve violence, there is no evidence within the past 5 years of a violation relating to narcotics or restricted dangerous drugs other than a violation that qualifies for the program, and the defendant has no prior conviction for a felony within 5 years prior to the alleged commission of the charged offense. Under the pretrial diversion program created by this bill, a qualifying defendant would enter a plea of not guilty and waive his or her right to a trial by jury, and proceedings would be suspended in order for the defendant to enter a drug treatment program for 12 to 18 months, or longer if requested by the defendant with good cause. The bill would require the court, if the defendant does not perform satisfactorily in the program or is convicted of specified crimes, to terminate the program and reinstate the criminal proceedings. The bill would require the criminal charges to be dismissed if the defendant completes the program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1000.4 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 393 to be operative only if this bill and SB 393 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
Jun 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Jan 23, 2017 Signed Oct 14, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 13, 2017 · Assembly Jun 1, 2017

How they voted

24–15
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Sep 13, 2017
D Democratic27
24 Yea 2 Nay 1
88% Yea
R Republican13
13 Nay
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
29
Key actions
11
Committee
11
Amendments
4
Oct 14, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 14, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 45. Noes 29. Page 3372.).
lower
Sep 13, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-15-1)
senate
Sep 13, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 15 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 8, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Sep 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (September 1).
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 12, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (July 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 14, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 1, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-26-6)
assembly
May 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 26).
lower
Apr 5, 2017
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 15, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (March 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 9, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 8, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 28, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 6, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 24, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Susan Eggman
Susan Eggman
DDemocratic
CA
5