Sex offenses: professional services.
Summary
Under existing law, a person who touches an intimate part of another person for the purpose of sexual arousal, sexual gratification, or sexual abuse, and the victim is at the time unconscious of the nature of the act because the perpetrator fraudulently represented that the touching served a professional purpose, is guilty of sexual battery punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year or in the state prison for 2, 3, or 4 years, and a fine not to exceed $10,000. Under existing law, the crimes of rape, sodomy, oral copulation, and sexual penetration, when the victim was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant of the essential characteristics of the act due to the perpetrator's fraudulent representation that the sexual penetration or oral copulation served a professional purpose, are punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 3, 6, or 8 years. This bill would expand the crime of sexual battery to apply to a person who performs professional services that entail having access to another person's body and who touches an intimate part of that person's body while performing those services, and the touching was against the person's will and for the purpose of sexual arousal, sexual gratification, or sexual abuse. The bill would expand the definitions of each of the crimes of rape, sodomy, oral copulation, and sexual penetration to include any of those crimes performed against a victim's will by a professional whose services entail having access to the victim's body, if the conduct is performed by the professional while performing those services. By expanding the scope of these crimes, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 288a of the Penal Code proposed by SB 1494 to be operative as specified. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
May 2018
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 7, 2018
Last action Aug 16, 2018
Floor votes · Assembly May 29, 2018
How they voted
70–2
Passed
Total votes 72
May 29, 2018
D
Democratic50
96% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican21
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Aug 16, 2018
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 6, 2018
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 21, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 20, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 19).
upper
Jun 7, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 29, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-2)
assembly
May 25, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 25).
lower
Apr 4, 2018
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 21, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 22, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 8, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tom Daly
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2078
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2078. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline