Mental health: firearms.
Summary
Existing law makes it a crime for a person who has been taken into custody, assessed, and admitted to a designated facility because he or she is a danger to himself, herself, or others, as a result of a mental health disorder to own a firearm for a period of 5 years after the person is released from the facility. Existing law allows a person who is prohibited from owning a firearm pursuant to these provisions to petition the court for a hearing in which the district attorney is required to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the person would not be likely to use firearms in a safe and lawful manner. If the people do not meet this burden, existing law requires the court to order that the person not be subject to this prohibition on the possession of firearms. This bill would prohibit a person who has been taken into custody, assessed, and admitted to a designated facility because he or she is a danger to himself, herself, or others, as a result of a mental health disorder and who was previously taken into custody, assessed, and admitted one or more times within a period of one year preceding the most recent admittance from owning a firearm for the remainder of his or her life. The bill would extend the above hearing process to a person under these provisions. Because a violation of the firearm prohibition would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires the facility to provide a person subject to the prohibition with a form to request a hearing and to forward the form to the superior court if the person requests a hearing. Existing law requires the Department of Justice to prescribe the form. This bill would require that form to include an authorization for the release of the person's mental health records, upon request, to the appropriate district attorney solely for use in the hearing. The bill would require the Department of Justice to update the form in accordance with these requirements and distribute the form to facilities by January 1, 2020. The bill would prohibit the facility from submitting the form on behalf of the person. Existing law requires the court to set a hearing within 30 days of receipt of a request. Existing law authorizes a continuance of 14 days, upon a showing of good cause by the district attorney. This bill would instead require the court to set the hearing within 60 days. The bill would further authorize a continuance of 30 days, upon a showing of good cause by the district attorney. The bill would allow a person who is subject to a lifetime firearm prohibition to file a subsequent petition every 5 years to show by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she can use firearms in a safe and lawful manner, as provided. Existing law makes it a crime for a person who has been certified for intensive treatment after being admitted to a designated facility because he or she is a danger to himself, herself, or others, as a result of a mental health disorder, to own a firearm for a period of 5 years. Existing law allows a person who is prohibited from owning a firearm pursuant to these provisions to petition the court for an order that he or she may own a firearm. Existing law requires the clerk of the court to set a hearing date at the time the petition is filed. Existing law authorizes a continuance of 14 days after the district attorney is notified of the hearing date. This bill would require the court to set a hearing date within 60 days. The bill would further authorize a continuance of 30 days after the district attorney has been notified of the hearing date. If additional continuances are granted, the bill would limit the total length of time for continuances to 60 days. This bill would make these provisions operative on January 1, 2020. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
May 2018
Senate Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Jan 31, 2018
Signed Sep 28, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2018 · Assembly May 29, 2018
How they voted
30–3
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 22, 2018
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican11
63% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Amendments
4
Sep 28, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2018
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 68. Noes 0. Page 6629.).
lower
Aug 22, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-3-2)
senate
Aug 22, 2018
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 17, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 6, 2018
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 20, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 7, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 29, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (59-1-12)
assembly
May 25, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 25).
lower
Apr 18, 2018
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 10, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 5, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 3).
lower
Mar 1, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 28, 2018
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 8, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 1, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 3.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Evan Low
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1968
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1968. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline