Military diversion: restitution.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a court, with the consent of the defendant and a waiver of the defendant's speedy trial right, to postpone prosecution, either temporarily or permanently, of a misdemeanor and place the defendant in a pretrial diversion program, if the defendant was, or currently is, a member of the United States military and if he or she may be suffering from sexual trauma, traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, substance abuse, or mental health problems as a result of his or her military service. Existing law authorizes the defendant to be referred to services for treatment as part of the pretrial diversion program. Under existing law, if the defendant performs satisfactorily during the period of diversion, at the end of the period of diversion, the criminal charges are required to be dismissed. Existing law provides for the compensation of victims of crime by requiring the court to order a defendant convicted of a crime to pay restitution to the victim or victims of the crime. Existing law establishes the Restitution Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, to indemnify victims of crime. This bill would authorize the court, when a defendant consents to be placed in the veterans' pretrial diversion program, to order the defendant to pay restitution to any victim of the crime. The bill would authorize the use of funds in the Restitution Fund for a new purpose, thereby making an appropriation. By increasing the duties of local agencies that collect restitution funds, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2018
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 12, 2018
Last action Mar 20, 2018
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
7
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Mar 20, 2018
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 6, 2018
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 26, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 22, 2018
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Jan 29, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 13, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 12.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Steve Choi
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1869
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1869. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline