Tribal gaming: compact ratification.
Summary
Existing federal law, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, provides for the negotiation and execution of tribal-state gaming compacts for the purpose of authorizing certain types of gaming on Indian lands within a state. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to negotiate and conclude tribal-state gaming compacts, subject to ratification by the Legislature. Existing law expressly ratifies a number of tribal-state gaming compacts, and amendments of tribal-state gaming compacts, between the State of California and specified Indian tribes. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. This bill would ratify the amendment to the tribal-state gaming compact entered into between the State of California and the United Auburn Indian Community, executed on August 18, 2017. The bill would provide that, in deference to tribal sovereignty, certain actions related to that compact are not projects for purposes of CEQA. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Jan 17, 2017
Signed Oct 3, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 5, 2017 · Assembly May 11, 2017
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Sep 5, 2017
D
Democratic25
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
11
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Oct 3, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 7, 2017
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3014.).
lower
Sep 5, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
Sep 5, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 7 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 30, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Aug 29, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Aug 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Jul 11, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 24, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 11, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-2-7)
assembly
May 3, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 3).
lower
Apr 25, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jan 30, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Jan 18, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Frank Bigelow
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 174
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 174. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline