Protective orders: human trafficking: pimping: pandering.
Summary
Existing law requires a court to consider issuing a protective order restraining the defendant from contact with the victim for up to 10 years in all cases in which a criminal defendant has been convicted of a crime involving domestic violence, rape, unlawful sexual intercourse, or any crime requiring registration as a sex offender, including, but not limited to, pimping or pandering a minor, and human trafficking to effect or maintain a violation of specified sex offenses. A violation of a protective order is punishable as contempt, a misdemeanor. This bill would additionally require the court to consider issuing a protective order, as provided above, in all cases in which a criminal defendant has been convicted of human trafficking with the intent to obtain forced labor or services, and pimping or pandering without regard to whether the victim is a minor. Because a violation of the protective order would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
May 2018
Senate Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Jan 3, 2018
Signed Sep 27, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2018
How they voted
39–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Aug 24, 2018
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican14
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Sep 27, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 24, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (39-0-1)
senate
Aug 24, 2018
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 17, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 6, 2018
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 20, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 7, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 25, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 25).
lower
Apr 4, 2018
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 6, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 16, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 4, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 3.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jordan Cunningham
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1735
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1735. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline