Alcoholic beverages: licenses: suspension and revocation tied-house exception.
Summary
Existing law, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, regulates the application, issuance, and suspension of alcoholic beverage licenses by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Existing law requires the Chief of the Bureau of Food and Drug Inspection to notify the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the conviction of any licensee of any violation of the California Pure Foods Act in connection with alcoholic beverages. Existing law requires the department to promptly investigate whether grounds exist for suspension or revocation of the license. This bill would instead require the Director of the State Department of Public Health to notify the department of the conviction of any licensees of any violation of the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law in connection with alcoholic beverages. The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act generally prohibits a manufacturer, winegrower, distiller, bottler, or wholesaler, among other licensees, or agents of these licensees, from paying a retailer for advertising. The act creates a variety of exceptions from this prohibition, including permitting specified licensees to purchase advertising space and time from, or on behalf of, an on-sale retail licensee that is an owner, manager, or major tenant of certain stadiums, parks, entertainment complexes, and arenas, subject to specified conditions. Existing law requires the purchase of advertising space or time in this context to be conducted pursuant to a written contract with the on-sale licensee, with a specified exception. Existing law makes it a crime for an on-sale licensee to coerce certain licensees to purchase advertising space or time, as specified. This bill would expand the exceptions described above to allow beer manufacturers, winegrowers, distilled spirits rectifiers, distilled spirits manufacturers, or distilled spirits manufacturer's agents to purchase advertising space and time, in connection with described events, from, or on behalf of, on-sale retail licensees, as described above, at a specified stadium in the City of Los Angeles. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Los Angeles. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 25503.6 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by SB 582 and SB 664 to be operative only if this bill and SB 582, this bill and SB 664, or all 3 bills are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Mar 16, 2017
Signed Oct 4, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 5, 2017 · Assembly Sep 14, 2017
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 32
Sep 5, 2017
D
Democratic22
95% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
13
Committee
9
Amendments
5
Oct 4, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 14, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0)
assembly
Sep 14, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3386.).
lower
Sep 13, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (September 13).
lower
Sep 7, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on G.O. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 5, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-2)
senate
Sep 5, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 7 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 29, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 17, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 13, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (July 11).
upper
Jul 3, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
May 18, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Apr 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 26).
lower
Apr 19, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 30, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Mar 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee April 16.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1724
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1724. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline