Public postsecondary education: residency: dependents of armed forces members.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, the segments of the public postsecondary education system in the state include the University of California, which is administered by the Regents of the University of California, the California State University, which is administered by the Trustees of the California State University, and the California Community Colleges, which are administered by the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges. Existing law establishes uniform student residency requirements for purposes of ascertaining the amount of tuition and fees to be paid by students of public postsecondary education institutions. Existing law entitles a student to resident classification for the purpose of determining tuition and fees if the student is a member, or a child or spouse who is a dependent of a member, of the Armed Forces of the United States stationed in the state on active duty, except as specified. Existing law further provides that, if that member of the Armed Forces of the United States, whose dependent natural or adopted child, stepchild, or spouse is in attendance at an institution, (1) is thereafter transferred on military orders to a place outside this state where the member continues to serve in the Armed Forces of the United States, or (2) is thereafter retired as an active member of the Armed Forces of the United States, the student dependent shall not lose his or her resident classification so long as he or she remains continuously enrolled at that institution. This bill would extend that resident classification for designated dependents of transferred and retired members of the Armed Forces of the United States to those dependents who have been admitted to a public postsecondary institution before the transfer or retirement. The bill would request the Regents of the University of California to establish the same residency benefits as those established by this bill for students enrolled at the University of California. To the extent that the bill would impose new duties on community college districts, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2017
Committee Review
Jul 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Jul 2017
Signed into Law
Aug 2017
Introduced Jan 17, 2017
Signed Aug 7, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Jul 20, 2017 · Assembly May 4, 2017
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 32
Jul 20, 2017
D
Democratic22
95% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
11
Committee
10
Aug 7, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 20, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-2)
senate
Jul 20, 2017
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jul 17, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 7, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on V.A. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 7). Re-referred to Com. on V.A.
upper
May 18, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on ED. and V.A.
upper
May 4, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-4)
assembly
Apr 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 26).
lower
Apr 5, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 15, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on V.A. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (March 14). Re-referred to Com. on V.A.
lower
Jan 30, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HIGHER ED. and V.A.
lower
Jan 18, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 17.
lower
1 primary · 14 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
RJ
Rocky J. Chávez
RRepublican
Co
Catharine B. Baker
RRepublican
Co
Chad Mayes
IIndependent
Co
Cristina Garcia
DDemocratic
Co
Dante Acosta
RRepublican
Co
Devon Mathis
RRepublican
Co
Eduardo Garcia
DDemocratic
Co
Jim Patterson
RRepublican
Co
Marie Waldron
RRepublican
Co
Matthew Harper
RRepublican
Co
Patrick O'Donnell
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 172
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 172. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline