Examination of prospective jurors.
Summary
Existing law requires the court, in a criminal case, to conduct an initial examination of prospective jurors. Upon completion of this initial examination, existing law grants counsel for each party the right to examine any of the prospective jurors, as specified. Existing law authorizes the court to limit the oral and direct questioning of prospective jurors, as specified. This bill would require a trial judge to permit counsel for each party to conduct a jury examination that is calculated to discover bias or prejudice with regard to the circumstances of a particular case or the parties before the court. The bill would require the scope of the examination conducted by counsel to be within reasonable limits prescribed by the trial judge in the judge's sound discretion, as specified. The bill would also require the trial judge to permit supplemental time for questioning based on individual responses or conduct of jurors that may evince attitudes inconsistent with suitability to serve as a fair and impartial juror in the particular case. The bill would require the trial judge to, in his or her sound discretion, consider the use of reasonable written questionnaires for jury examination when requested by counsel. The bill would also require the trial judge, at the earliest practical time, to provide the parties with the list of prospective jurors in the order in which they will be called to help facilitate the jury selection process.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
Jun 2017
Senate Passage
Aug 2017
Signed into Law
Sep 2017
Introduced Feb 17, 2017
Signed Sep 26, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2017 · Assembly Jun 1, 2017
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Aug 31, 2017
D
Democratic27
92% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
11
Committee
8
Amendments
7
Sep 26, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 5, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 65. Noes 8. Page 2941.).
lower
Aug 31, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-2)
senate
Aug 31, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 22, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jul 12, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 11).
upper
Jun 29, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 14, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 1, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-11-6)
assembly
May 30, 2017
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1775.)
lower
May 9, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (May 9).
lower
May 1, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 25, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 24, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 28, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 27, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 16, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 19, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1541
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1541. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline