Drinking water: cross-connection or backflow prevention device inspectors: certification.
Summary
Existing law, the California Safe Drinking Water Act, requires the State Water Resources Control Board to administer provisions relating to the regulation of drinking water to protect public health, including, but not limited to, conducting research, studies, and demonstration projects relating to the provision of a dependable, safe supply of drinking water, enforcing the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, adopting regulations, and conducting studies and investigations to assess the quality of private domestic water wells. Existing law requires any person who owns a public water system to ensure that the system does certain things, including, but not limited to, that it will not be subject to backflow under normal operating conditions. Existing law, to ensure that testing and maintenance of backflow prevention devices are performed by persons qualified to do testing and maintenance, authorizes local health officers to maintain programs for certification of backflow prevention device testers and requires the certification program to be consistent with backflow protection regulations adopted by the state board. A violation of these provisions, or of an order by a local health officer pursuant to these provisions, is a misdemeanor. Existing law requires the state board, on or before January 1, 2020, to adopt standards for backflow protection and cross-connection control. This bill would require valid and current certifications for cross-connection inspection and testing or backflow prevention device inspection, testing, and maintenance that meet specified requirements for competency to be accepted certification tests either until the state board promulgates standards for certified backflow prevention device testers and cross-connection control specialists, or until January 1, 2020, whichever comes first. The bill would, under certain conditions, prohibit a water supplier from refusing to recognize statewide certifications that meet standards set by the state board. Because a violation of that prohibition would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Aug 2018
Vetoed
Sep 2018
Introduced Feb 17, 2017
Vetoed Sep 19, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Aug 21, 2018 · Assembly May 30, 2017
How they voted
22–11
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 21, 2018
D
Democratic24
91% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
45
Key actions
14
Committee
14
Amendments
8
Sep 19, 2018
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 27, 2018
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 52. Noes 24. Page 6668.).
lower
Aug 24, 2018
Committee
Action rescinded whereby the bill was re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 23, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 22, 2018
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 21, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-11-2)
senate
Aug 14, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Sep 8, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Sep 7, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Sep 6, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (September 1).
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 18, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 17, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 12).
upper
Jul 5, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 20, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 8, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
May 30, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (49-21-4)
assembly
May 24, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 24).
lower
May 2, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 27, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (April 25).
lower
Apr 20, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Apr 19, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.S. & T.M. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 3, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 16, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Feb 19, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tony Thurmond
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1529
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1529. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline