Licensees: fiduciary funds.
Summary
Existing law requires that all funds received by any person acting as a licensed insurance producer, an administrator, a surplus line broker, or a bail licensee, as premium or return premium on or under any policy of insurance or undertaking of bail, are received and held by that person in his or her fiduciary capacity. Existing law requires a person who holds one of the above-described licenses who receives fiduciary funds to maintain those funds, as provided, including, but not limited to, maintaining those funds on California business, at all times in a trustee bank account or depository in California, separate from any other account or depository, in specified amounts. This bill would delete the requirement that the funds be maintained in a trustee bank account or depository in California and would instead require the funds be maintained in a trust account in a bank or savings and loan association, within any state of the United States, which account is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and is licensed by any state government within the United States or by the United States government. Existing law authorizes an above-described licensee to hold fiduciary funds in bonds, certificates, obligations, certificates of deposit, and repurchase agreements. Existing law requires a bank, as defined, or savings association, as defined, to maintain evidence of those fiduciary funds on California business, in a custodian or trust account in California, separate from any other funds, in specified amounts. This bill, among other things, would delete the reference to the fiduciary funds being in a custodian or trust account in California and the definitions for a bank and a savings association and would require evidence of the funds to be maintained at all times in a trust account in a bank or savings and loan association within any state of the United States, which account is insured by the FDIC and is licensed by any state government within the United States or by the United States government, as specified. The bill would require all administrative actions involving trust accounts to be subject to the jurisdiction of the commissioner, and all suits involving trust accounts to be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state and the federal courts located within the State of California. The bill would require the licensee, as a condition of maintaining its license, to file and maintain with the Insurance Commissioner a written designation of the agent for service of process in this state for the trust account located outside the State of California being utilized by the licensee. The bill would also require any licensee who receives fiduciary funds as cash to initially maintain those funds in a trust account in a bank or savings and loan association in California, licensed by the State of California or the United States government and insured by the FDIC.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Jun 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Jun 2017
Signed into Law
Jul 2017
Introduced Feb 17, 2017
Signed Jul 18, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Jun 26, 2017 · Assembly Jun 29, 2017
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 32
Jun 26, 2017
D
Democratic22
95% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
10
Committee
7
Amendments
5
Jul 18, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 29, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-3)
assembly
Jun 29, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2400.).
lower
Jun 27, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 26, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-1)
senate
Jun 12, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 8, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 7).
upper
May 30, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on I., B. & F.I.
upper
May 17, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and RLS.
upper
May 2, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 1).
lower
Apr 25, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Apr 24, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 23, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 13, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Feb 19, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Matthew Dababneh
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1460
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1460. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline