Court reporters: electronic transcripts.
Summary
Existing law requires an official reporter or official reporter pro tempore of the superior court to take down in shorthand specified information regarding the testimony and proceedings before the court in civil cases, felony cases, and misdemeanor or infraction cases on order of the court, and in only civil cases or felony cases, at the request of a party or counsel. Existing law authorizes a court, party, or other person entitled to a transcript to request that it be delivered in computer-readable form, except as specified. This bill would instead require an official reporter or official reporter pro tempore to deliver a transcript in electronic form, in compliance with the California Rules of Court, to any court, party, or person entitled to the transcript, as specified, unless, among other things, the party or person requests the transcript in paper form. The bill would provide that an official reporter or official reporter pro tempore is not required to use a specific vendor, technology, or software to comply with this requirement unless he or she agrees with the court, party, or person entitled to the transcript to use a specific vendor, technology, or software.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Feb 17, 2017
Signed Oct 6, 2017
Floor votes · Assembly Sep 13, 2017
How they voted
74–1
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 76
Sep 13, 2017
D
Democratic53
96% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican22
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
11
Committee
10
Amendments
5
Oct 6, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 13, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-1-1)
assembly
Sep 13, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 1. Page 3324.).
lower
Sep 13, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 15 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 8, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jul 17, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 19, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 8, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 24, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 3, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 3).
lower
Apr 24, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 19, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 18).
lower
Apr 17, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 6, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 16, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 19, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jay Obernolte
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1450
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1450. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline