City prosecutors.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes the charter of any city to establish the office of city prosecutor with specified powers and duties. Existing law makes it a crime for a person to maintain, permit, or allow a public nuisance to exist upon his or her property or premises, or to maintain, permit, or allow a public nuisance to exist on property or premises he or she is occupying or leasing from another person, after reasonable notice in writing from a city attorney. This bill would also authorize a city prosecutor to prosecute a person for allowing a public nuisance to exist in those situations. (2) Existing law authorizes a defendant to file a motion to disqualify a city attorney from performing an authorized duty involving a criminal matter, and prohibits the motion from being granted unless the evidence shows that a conflict of interest exists that would render it unlikely that the defendant would receive a fair trial. Existing law authorizes a city attorney to appeal an order recusing him or her from a proceeding. This bill would expand those procedures to additionally apply to a city prosecutor. (3) Existing law requires the Attorney General to furnish state summary criminal history information to specified persons or entities if needed in the course of their duties, including to any city attorney. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor for a person authorized to receive state summary criminal history information to knowingly furnish the information to a person who is not authorized by law to receive it. This bill would require the Attorney General to furnish state summary criminal history information to a city prosecutor. Because the unlawful disclosure of this summary criminal history information would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law exempts records of the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) of a conviction of reckless driving from the California Public Records Act on and after a date which is 5 years after the date of conviction of that offense. Existing law requires, on and after that date, the department to make that information available only to specified persons, including prosecuting city attorneys. This bill would additionally make that information available to city prosecutors. (5) Existing law makes the home address that appears in a record of the DMV of specified people, including city attorneys or attorneys employed by a city attorney, as specified, confidential if that person requests the confidentiality of that information. This bill would expand those provisions to additionally cover the home address of a city prosecutor or an attorney employed by the city prosecutor, as specified. (6) Existing law requires the DMV to provide access to the records of the department to, among others, city attorneys prosecuting misdemeanor actions, as specified. This bill would additionally require the DMV to provide access to the records of the department to city prosecutors prosecuting misdemeanor actions. (7) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 11105 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 420 to be operative only if this bill and SB 420 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Aug 2017
Signed into Law
Sep 2017
Introduced Feb 17, 2017
Signed Sep 26, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2017 · Assembly Sep 5, 2017
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Aug 31, 2017
D
Democratic25
96% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Sep 26, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 5, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-2)
assembly
Sep 5, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2935.).
lower
Aug 31, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
Aug 31, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 18, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jul 10, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 20, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 1, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 10, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 10).
lower
Apr 25, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 29, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 28, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 27, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 19, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Patrick O'Donnell
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1418
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1418. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline