Surrogacy.
Summary
Existing law requires an assisted reproduction agreement for gestational carriers to include certain terms, including, among others, the identity of the intended parent or parents. Upon the petition of any party to a properly executed assisted reproduction agreement for gestational carriers, a court is required to issue a judgment or order establishing a parent-child relationship between the child or children and the intended parent or parents identified in the surrogacy agreement and further establishing that the surrogate, her spouse, or partner is not a parent of, and has no parental rights or duties with respect to, the child or children. Existing law requires the judgment or order to terminate any parental rights of the surrogate and her spouse or partner without further hearing or evidence, unless specified conditions are met. This bill would delete this reference to the parental rights of the surrogate and her spouse or partner and would instead require the court to issue the judgment or order regarding parentage forthwith, unless specified conditions are met.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Aug 2017
Signed into Law
Sep 2017
Introduced Feb 17, 2017
Signed Sep 27, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2017 · Assembly May 31, 2017
How they voted
38–1
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Aug 31, 2017
D
Democratic27
96% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Sep 27, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 5, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2934.).
lower
Aug 31, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-1-1)
senate
Aug 31, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 19, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 18).
upper
Jul 11, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 14, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 31, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-6-7)
assembly
May 9, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 9).
lower
May 8, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 4, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 20, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 13, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 19, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Autumn R. Burke
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1396
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1396. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline