Firearms: concealed carry licenses.
Summary
Existing law prohibits a person from carrying a concealed firearm. Existing law authorizes the sheriff of a county, or the chief or other head of a municipal police department, if good cause exists for the issuance, and subject to certain other criteria, to issue a license to carry a concealed handgun or to carry a loaded and exposed handgun, as specified. Existing law prohibits the possession of a firearm in certain specified locations, including in a state or local public building, in a public transit facility or aboard a public transit vehicle, or in a state park. Existing law provides an exemption from these prohibitions for persons who possess a valid license to carry a concealed firearm. Existing law additionally prohibits the possession of a firearm in certain other locations, but does not provide an exemption for persons who possess a valid license to carry a concealed firearm. These locations include gun shows, polling places, labor demonstrations, the State Capitol, and the grounds of a school. This bill would require the sheriff of a county, or the chief or other head of a municipal police department, to issue a license to carry a concealed handgun or to carry a loaded and exposed handgun, as specified, to an applicant who meets the criteria specified in existing law, but would not require the applicant to demonstrate good cause for issuance of the license. This bill would exempt the holder of a valid license to carry a concealed firearm from prosecution under any state law or regulation that prohibits the possession of a firearm within any specified location. By requiring local law enforcement authorities to issue a license to carry a concealed firearm, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2017
Last action Feb 1, 2018
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
2
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Apr 18, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 3, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 30, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 30, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 19, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Travis Allen
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1394
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1394. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline