Reckless driving: speed contests: vehicle impoundment.
Summary
Under existing law, a person who drives a vehicle upon a highway or in an offstreet parking facility in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property is guilty of reckless driving, which is punishable, upon conviction, by imprisonment in the county jail, payment of a fine, or both the imprisonment and fine, as specified. Existing law makes it a crime to engage in a motor vehicle speed contest on a highway. Existing law provides that if a person is convicted of engaging in a motor vehicle speed contest on a highway and the vehicle used in the violation is registered to that person, the vehicle may be impounded at the registered owner's expense for not less than one day nor more than 30 days. Under existing law, when a peace officer determines that a person was engaged in reckless driving or a speed contest, the peace officer may immediately arrest and take the person into custody, cause the removal and seizure of the vehicle used in the offense, as prescribed. Existing law requires the vehicle to be impounded for not more than 30 days. This bill would, with respect to a conviction for reckless driving, or a conviction for engaging in a speed contest, when the person convicted is the registered owner of the vehicle, provide that if it is the first offense the vehicle may be impounded for 30 days, and if it is the 2nd or subsequent offense the vehicle shall be impounded for 30 days, at the registered owner's expense. The bill would allow the impoundment period to be reduced by the number of days, if any, that the vehicle was previously impounded, and would authorize the court to decline to impound the vehicle if it would cause undue hardship for the defendant's family, as specified. The bill would authorize the release of the vehicle to the legal owner before the 30th day of impoundment, if specified conditions are met. This bill would, for speed contests, authorize an officer to issue a notice to correct for violation of a mechanical or safety requirement and require correction to be made within 30 days after the date upon which the vehicle was released from impound. The bill would require the violation to be dismissed upon correction, as specified. By imposing new requirements on local agencies responsible for vehicle impoundment, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Vetoed
Jan 2018
Introduced Feb 17, 2017
Vetoed Jan 3, 2018
Floor votes · Assembly Sep 15, 2017
How they voted
71–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 73
Sep 15, 2017
D
Democratic51
100% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican21
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
12
Committee
10
Amendments
4
Jan 3, 2018
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 4, 2017
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 15, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-2)
assembly
Sep 15, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 3456.).
lower
Sep 14, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 7, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 12, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 3, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 21, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 13, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 6, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 18, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and PUB. S.
upper
Apr 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 26).
lower
Mar 28, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (March 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 16, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 19, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Laura Friedman
DDemocratic
Co
Joel Anderson
RRepublican
Co
TM
Tony Mendoza
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1393
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1393. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline