Carpet recycling.
Summary
Existing law requires a manufacturer of carpets sold in this state to submit, either individually or through a carpet stewardship organization, a carpet stewardship plan that meets specified requirements to the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. Existing law imposes a carpet stewardship assessment per unit of carpet sold in the state that is remitted to the carpet stewardship organization and may be expended to carry out the organization's carpet stewardship plan. Existing law provides that the purpose of carpet stewardship laws is to increase the amount of postconsumer carpet that is diverted from landfills and recycled into secondary products or otherwise managed in a manner that is consistent with the state's hierarchy for waste management practices. Existing law requires a carpet stewardship organization, in order to achieve compliance with the carpet stewardship laws, to demonstrate to the department that it has achieved continuous meaningful improvement in the rates of recycling and diversion of postconsumer carpet subject to its stewardship plan and in meeting the other specified goals included in the organization's plan. This bill would provide that it is the goal of the state to reach a 24% recycling rate for postconsumer carpet by January 1, 2020, and to meet or exceed that rate continually thereafter. The bill would require a carpet stewardship plan to achieve a 24% recycling rate for postconsumer carpet by January 1, 2020, and to include quantifiable 5-year goals and annual goals, as specified. The bill would require a carpet stewardship plan to achieve any other recycling rate, and include goals, that the department required after plan review. The bill would require a review no sooner than January 1, 2020, and no less frequently than every 3 years thereafter and would authorize adjustments to the recycling rate and program goals by the department upon each review. The bill would require a carpet stewardship organization to provide to the department all data necessary for the department to evaluate the effectiveness of the program as it is described in the carpet stewardship plan and in annual reports submitted by the carpet stewardship organization. If a carpet stewardship plan that was previously approved by the department terminates or is revoked, the bill would authorize the department to allow a manufacturer that is no longer subject to the plan to continue to sell carpet in California for a period of one year after the plan terminates or is revoked, without being subject to penalties, if the manufacturer meets either of 2 requirements. The bill would revise the criteria that a carpet stewardship organization is required to meet in order to achieve compliance with the carpet stewardship laws. The bill would prohibit a carpet stewardship organization from expending funds from the carpet stewardship assessment for specified costs and penalties, including for engineered solid waste conversion, as defined, the use of cement kilns to burn carpet, or transformation, as defined. The bill would create an advisory committee that would be required to provide comments and recommendations on carpet stewardship plans, amendments to plans, and annual reports. The bill would require the carpet stewardship organization or manufacturer to incorporate those recommendations to the extent feasible. The bill would require the Director of Resources Recycling and Recovery, the Speaker of the Assembly, and the Senate Committee on Rules to appoint members to the advisory committee, as specified. Existing law requires the Department of General Services, to the extent feasible and within existing resources, to take appropriate steps, including, but not limited to, revising relevant procurement rules, to ensure that postconsumer carpet that is removed from state buildings is managed in a manner consistent with the purpose of the carpet stewardship laws. This bill would require the Department of General Services to additionally ensure, under those same conditions, that carpet purchased by a state agency contains a minimum amount of postconsumer content that would be determined by the Department of General Services and published in the State Contracting Manual by July 1, 2018. Existing law defines "carpet" for purposes of these laws to mean a manufactured article that is used in commercial or residential buildings affixed or placed on the floor or building walking surface as a decorative or functional building interior feature and that is primarily constructed of a top visible surface of synthetic face fibers or yarns or tufts attached to a backing system derived from synthetic or natural materials. This bill would expand the carpet stewardship program by revising the definition of carpet to include manufactured items that meet those same descriptions, but that are primarily constructed of a top visible surface of natural face fibers, yarns, or tufts.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Feb 17, 2017
Signed Oct 14, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 12, 2017 · Assembly May 30, 2017
How they voted
27–8
Passed
Total votes 35
Sep 12, 2017
D
Democratic25
100% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
15
Committee
12
Amendments
7
Oct 14, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 15, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 52. Noes 22. Page 3499.).
lower
Sep 14, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (September 13).
lower
Sep 13, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 13, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 15 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 12, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-8)
senate
Sep 8, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jul 10, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 6, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 5).
upper
Jun 21, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jun 12, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 8, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
May 30, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-2-5)
assembly
May 24, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 24).
lower
May 9, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 8, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 18, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 6, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 3).
lower
Mar 9, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 19, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1158
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1158. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline