Vehicles: automated traffic enforcement systems.
Summary
Existing law requires a driver facing a steady circular red signal alone to stop at a marked limit line, but if none, before entering the crosswalk on the near side of the intersection or, if none, then before entering the intersection, and to remain stopped until an indication to proceed is shown, except as specified. Existing law makes it unlawful for a driver to enter or travel in any lane over which a red signal is shown. A violation of those provisions is an infraction punishable by a fine of $100. Existing law defines an "official traffic control signal" as any device, whether manually, electrically, or mechanically operated, by which traffic is alternately directed to stop and proceed and which is erected by authority of a public body or official having jurisdiction. Existing law states that any required stop be made at a sign, crosswalk, or limit line indicating where the stop is to be made, but, in the absence of that sign or marking, existing law requires that the stop be made at the official traffic control signal. This bill would also require a stop to be made at an official traffic control signal erected and maintained at a freeway or highway onramp. The bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes to that provision.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Feb 17, 2017
Signed Oct 7, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 6, 2017 · Assembly May 11, 2017
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Sep 6, 2017
D
Democratic25
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Oct 7, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 6, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
Sep 6, 2017
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Sep 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (September 1).
upper
Jul 10, 2017
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 24, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 11, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (72-0-2)
assembly
May 3, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 3).
lower
Apr 25, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 3, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 6, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 19, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Steve Choi
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1094
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1094. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline