Education: Child care: individualized county child care subsidy plans: the Every Kid Counts (EKC) Act.
Summary
(1) The Child Care and Development Services Act has a purpose of providing a comprehensive, coordinated, and cost-effective system of child care and development services for children from infancy to 13 years of age and their parents, including a full range of supervision, health, and support services through full- and part-time programs. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to develop standards for the implementation of quality child care programs. Existing law authorizes the Counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Fresno, Marin, Monterey, San Benito, San Diego, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Solano, and Sonoma, as individual pilot projects, to develop an individualized county child care subsidy plan, as provided. Existing law repeals each of these pilot programs on specified dates. This bill would repeal, recast, and revise the law relating to the above-specified counties' individualized subsidy plans and make related conforming changes, as provided. The bill would extend the operative dates of the individualized pilot programs by 6 months. (2) Existing law authorizes the City and County of San Francisco and the City of San Mateo to develop and implement individualized county child care subsidy plans that include specified elements. Existing law authorizes the plans to supersede state law concerning child care subsidy programs with regard to specified factors, including eligibility criteria, as provided. This bill would, among other things, make changes to the eligibility criteria and would allow the plans to supersede state law on ratios of four-year-old children in state preschool programs. (3) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Fresno, Marin, Monterey, San Benito, San Diego, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Solano, and Sonoma. (4) Existing law establishes the Every Kid Counts (EKC) Act, which requires the Scholarshare Investment Board to implement and administer a college savings program that incentivizes families to participate in a qualified tuition program established under the Golden State Scholarshare Trust Act or other college savings programs. Before implementing the program, existing law requires the board to make specified considerations, including how best to incentivize low-income families to participate in these college savings programs and whether and how proposed actions allow for rigorous evaluation of the effects of the EKC Act. Existing law requires the board and the Franchise Tax Board to exchange prescribed information in order to verify financial eligibility under these college savings programs. This bill would revise and recast the act to instead, among other things, require the Student Aid Commission to distribute grants to local governments and other entities that sponsor one or more comprehensive citywide or regional children's savings account programs to help families establish and maintain college savings accounts. The bill would make the amount of each grant $100,000, at a minimum, and would require each participating entity to meet certain requirements in order to receive the grant. (5) Existing law, the Budget Act of 2017, appropriates $3,000,000 for purposes of the Golden State Scholarshare Trust Program. This bill would repeal that appropriation and would appropriate that amount to the Student Aid Commission for purposes of the EKC College Savings Program. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2017
Committee Review
Mar 2018
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Mar 2018
Signed into Law
Mar 2018
Introduced Jan 10, 2017
Signed Mar 13, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Mar 8, 2018 · Assembly Mar 8, 2018
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 34
Mar 8, 2018
D
Democratic24
91% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
10
Committee
7
Amendments
4
Mar 13, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Mar 8, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-0-6)
assembly
Mar 8, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-2)
senate
Mar 8, 2018
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 4196.).
lower
Mar 8, 2018
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after March 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Mar 1, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (March 1).
upper
Feb 27, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
upper
Feb 26, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
upper
Feb 15, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
upper
Jun 13, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (June 13).
upper
Jun 12, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
upper
May 18, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
upper
Jan 19, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Jan 11, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 10.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 108
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 108. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline