Sales and use taxes: exclusion: garment alterations.
Summary
Existing sales and use tax laws impose a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. Existing law defines "sale" and "purchase" for these purposes and provides certain exclusions from those definitions. This bill, before January 1, 2023, would provide that "sale" and "purchase" do not include alterations to new or used garments if the alteration occurs after the retail sale of the new garment, the person performing the alteration was not the retailer of the new garment, and the person performing the alteration does not have an agreement with a clothing retailer to perform alterations for the clothing retailer or the clothing retailer's customers, thus excluding the purchase or sale of those alterations from imposition of sales and use tax. As a result, the retail sale subject to tax would be the sale of tangible personal property used or furnished in the alteration to the person who performs the alteration. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes cities and counties to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and existing laws authorize districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in accordance with the Transactions and Use Tax Law, which generally conforms to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Amendments to the Sales and Use Tax Law are automatically incorporated into the local tax laws. Existing law requires the state to reimburse cities and counties for revenue losses caused by the enactment of sales and use tax exemptions. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding these provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse cities and counties for sales and use tax revenues lost by them pursuant to this bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy, but its operative date would depend on its effective date.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 16, 2017
Last action Feb 1, 2018
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
3
Committee
7
Amendments
3
May 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 24, 2017
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 22, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (May 15).
lower
Apr 18, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Apr 17, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 22, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Mar 21, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 20, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Feb 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
William P. Brough
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1072
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1072. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline