AB 1069 California Assembly · 2017-2018 Regular Session

Local government: taxicab transportation services.

Summary
Existing law requires every city or county to adopt an ordinance or resolution in regard to taxicab transportation service and requires each city or county to provide for a policy for entry into the business of providing taxicab transportation service, the establishment or registration of rates for the provision of taxicab transportation service, and a mandatory controlled substance and alcohol testing certification program for drivers, as specified. Existing law, referred to as the pull-notice system, requires the prospective employer of a driver who drives a specified vehicle to obtain a report showing the driver's current public record as recorded by the Department of Motor Vehicles, as specified. A violation of this provision of the Vehicle Code is a crime. This bill, commencing January 1, 2019, would limit the applicability of that ordinance or resolution adoption requirement and related provisions to a city or county, including a charter city or charter county, in which a taxicab company is substantially located, and the City and County of San Francisco, regardless of whether a taxicab company is substantially located in the city and county. The bill, with respect to these cities or counties, except for the City and County of San Francisco, would additionally require provisions for the establishment or registration of rates for the provision of taxicab transportation service to meet specified requirements, would require permitted taxicab companies and drivers to comply with various additional specified requirements, including participation in the Department of Motor Vehicles' pull-notice system, would authorize the issuance of inspection stickers or other inspection compliance devices to compliant taxicab companies and the issuance of photo permits to compliant taxi drivers, would prohibit the placement of licensure, permitting, and certification requirements on taxicab companies or drivers that are not substantially located in their jurisdictions, would prohibit taxicab companies and taxicab drivers from operating within a county without a permit from the county or at least one city within the county and authorize a permitted taxicab company to provide prearranged trips anywhere within the county, and would subject unpermitted taxicab operation to a minimum fine of $5,000, as specified. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would provide an airport operator with separate and ultimate authority to regulate taxicab access to the airport and set access fees for taxicabs at the airport. The bill would define "substantially located" for these purposes and deem a city or county in which a taxicab company or taxicab driver operates as a city or county in which a taxicab company or taxicab driver is substantially located if the city or county enacts a resolution of intention to enter into a joint exercise of powers agreement or join a joint powers authority, or to enter into an agreement with a transit agency, for the purpose of regulating or administering taxicab companies and taxicab drivers. The bill, commencing January 1, 2018, would require taxicab companies and taxicab drivers to collect trip data to determine in what jurisdictions each company and driver are substantially located, and beginning January 1, 2019, would require the trip data collected in the previous 12 months to be provided upon date of renewal to the jurisdictions in which the company and driver are substantially located. The bill, commencing January 1, 2019, would authorize a city or county, regardless of whether a taxicab company or taxicab driver is substantially located within its jurisdiction, to adopt operating requirements for taxicab companies and taxicab drivers that are not related to permitting or business licensing and to impose civil liability for violation of these ordinances, as specified. The bill would include findings that the changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern and is not a municipal affair, and therefore shall apply equally to all cities, including charter cities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Feb 16, 2017 Signed Oct 13, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 13, 2017 · Assembly May 30, 2017

How they voted

34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Sep 13, 2017
D Democratic25
24 Yea 1
96% Yea
R Republican10
10 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
32
Key actions
16
Committee
13
Amendments
6
Oct 13, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 15, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 3504.).
lower
Sep 14, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (September 14).
lower
Sep 14, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on C. & C. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 14, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 13, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
Sep 8, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 28).
upper
Aug 22, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 12, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 5, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on T. & H. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Jun 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jun 8, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and T. & H.
upper
May 30, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-4)
assembly
May 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1717.)
lower
May 24, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 24).
lower
Apr 27, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 19, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on C. & C.
lower
Apr 18, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on C. & C. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 6, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on C. & C.
lower
Feb 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Evan Low
Evan Low
DDemocratic
CA
26