Asbestos Tort Trust Transparency Act and trial preferences.
Summary
Existing law provides generally for procedures governing civil actions. Existing law imposes additional procedures that apply with respect to limited types of civil actions. This bill would enact the Asbestos Tort Claim Trust Transparency Act, which would establish additional procedures with respect to civil actions pertaining to asbestos tort claims, as defined. The bill would, among other things, require that a plaintiff disclose specified information with respect to any asbestos trusts, as defined, against which the plaintiff has or could pursue a claim, and entitle a defendant to discovery with respect to relevant information pertaining to the plaintiff held by other asbestos trusts and to pursue various motions. This bill would require a plaintiff to serve certain sworn statements. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law authorizes certain parties to petition the court for preference, and, if the court grants a motion for preference, requires the court to set the matter for trial not more than 120 days from the date the motion for preference is granted. This bill would provide that a party to a civil action who is a veteran, as defined, is entitled to preference ahead of all parties who are not veterans. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 16, 2017
Last action Feb 1, 2018
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
4
Committee
5
Jan 9, 2018
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 20, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 13, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 6, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Kevin Kiley
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1056
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1056. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline