Employment discrimination: conviction history.
Summary
Existing law, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) , prohibits an employer from engaging in various defined forms of discriminatory employment practices. Existing law prohibits an employer, whether a public agency or private individual or corporation, from asking an applicant for employment to disclose, or from utilizing as a factor in determining any condition of employment, information concerning an arrest or detention that did not result in a conviction, or information concerning a referral or participation in, any pretrial or posttrial diversion program, except as specified. Existing law also prohibits a state or local agency from asking an applicant for employment to disclose information regarding a criminal conviction, except as specified, until the agency has determined the applicant meets the minimum employment qualifications for the position. This bill would repeal the prohibition on a state or local agency from asking an applicant for employment to disclose information regarding a criminal conviction, as described above. The bill would, instead, provide it is an unlawful employment practice under FEHA for an employer with 5 or more employees to include on any application for employment any question that seeks the disclosure of an applicant's conviction history, to inquire into or consider the conviction history of an applicant until that applicant has received a conditional offer, and, when conducting a conviction history background check, to consider, distribute, or disseminate information related to specified prior arrests, diversions, and convictions. This bill would also require an employer who intends to deny an applicant a position of employment solely or in part because of the applicant's conviction history to make an individualized assessment of whether the applicant's conviction history has a direct and adverse relationship with the specific duties of the job, and to consider certain topics when making that assessment. The bill would require an employer who makes a preliminary decision to deny employment based on that individualized assessment to provide the applicant written notification of the decision. The bill would require the notification to contain specified information. The bill would grant an applicant 5 business days to respond to that notification before the employer may make a final decision. If the applicant notifies the employer in writing that he or she disputes the accuracy of the conviction history and is obtaining evidence to support that assertion, the bill would grant the applicant an additional 5 business days to respond to the notice. The bill would require an employer to consider information submitted by the applicant before making a final decision. The bill would require an employer who has made a final decision to deny employment to the applicant to notify the applicant in writing of specified topics. The bill would exempt specified positions of employment from the provisions of the bill.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
Jun 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Feb 16, 2017
Signed Oct 14, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 13, 2017 · Assembly Jun 2, 2017
How they voted
25–10
Passed
Total votes 35
Sep 13, 2017
D
Democratic25
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
13
Committee
9
Amendments
8
Oct 14, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 15, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 42. Noes 30. Page 3483.).
lower
Sep 14, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 13, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-10)
senate
Sep 8, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Sep 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (September 1).
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 18, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 17, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (July 11).
upper
Jun 28, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 20, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Jun 14, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & I.R. and JUD.
upper
Jun 2, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-29-6)
assembly
May 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 6.) (May 26).
lower
May 17, 2017
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 3, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 2, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
May 1, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 9, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Feb 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1008
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1008. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline